SC-200 Practice Test 2 — 25 Questions

Question 1

A large enterprise uses Microsoft Defender for Cloud with the integrated Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management solution enabled for all servers. The security team wants to identify all virtual machines that have not been scanned for vulnerabilities in the last 7 days. They plan to use Azure Resource Graph (ARG) to generate a report. Which KQL query would correctly identify these machines?

Accepted Answer

securityresources | where type =~ 'microsoft.security/assessments' and name == '4da3e7e8-0e4b-4c5e-8e0a-7e8f4e8e4e8e' | where properties.status.code == 'Unhealthy' and properties.status.firstEvaluationDate < ago(7d). Option A is correct because it queries the `securityresources` table for the specific vulnerability assessment type (`microsoft.security/assessments`) and filters for the vulnerability assessment result named with the GUID `4da3e7e8-0e4b-4c5e-8e0a-7e8f4e8e4e8e`, which corresponds to the 'Vulnerabilities in your virtual machines should be remediated' assessment. It then checks that the status code is 'Unhealthy' (indicating vulnerabilities were found) and that the `firstEvaluationDate` is older than 7 days, which identifies machines that have not been scanned recently.

Answer

resources | where type =~ 'microsoft.compute/virtualmachines' | where properties.storageProfile.osDisk.managedDisk.id != ''

Answer

securityresources | where type =~ 'microsoft.security/regulatorycompliancestandards'

Answer

resources | where type =~ 'microsoft.security/securitystatuses'

Question 2

A security analyst is investigating a user who may have been compromised. The analyst sees a sign-in from an unusual location and then a series of suspicious actions performed by that user, including deleting files and sending emails. The analyst wants to find all emails sent by the user after the anomalous sign-in. Which advanced hunting tables should be used?

Accepted Answer

EmailEvents and IdentityLogonEvents. Option A is correct because the investigation requires correlating a specific sign-in event (from IdentityLogonEvents) with subsequent email activity (from EmailEvents). IdentityLogonEvents captures authentication details including location, while EmailEvents records email send/receive metadata. Joining these tables on the user principal name (UPN) and timestamp allows the analyst to filter all emails sent after the anomalous sign-in.

Answer

EmailEvents and DeviceFileEvents

Answer

IdentityLogonEvents and DeviceEvents

Answer

EmailAttachmentInfo and EmailUrlInfo alone

Question 3

A security analyst is investigating a compromised user account using Microsoft 365 Defender. The analyst wants to see all the sign-in attempts made by this user in the last 24 hours, including the IP addresses and locations. Which advanced hunting table should the analyst query?

Accepted Answer

IdentityLogonEvents. The IdentityLogonEvents table in Microsoft 365 Defender advanced hunting captures authentication events from Azure Active Directory, including sign-in attempts, IP addresses, and geographic locations. This makes it the correct table for an analyst investigating a compromised user account to review all sign-in activity over the last 24 hours.

Answer

AlertInfo

Answer

EmailAttachmentInfo

Answer

DeviceLogonEvents

Question 4

A security analyst in Microsoft 365 Defender needs to review all actions that were automatically taken by an investigation (e.g., isolating a device, deleting a file) that occurred during an incident. Where should the analyst find this list of executed actions?

Accepted Answer

Action center. The Action center in Microsoft 365 Defender is the centralized location that records all manual and automated response actions taken during investigations, such as device isolation, file deletion, or process termination. This includes actions automatically executed by automated investigation and response (AIR) playbooks during an incident. The analyst can filter the Action center by 'Automated' to see only those actions taken without manual intervention.

Answer

Hunting queries

Answer

Incidents page

Answer

Alerts page

Question 5

A security analyst is creating a custom detection rule in Microsoft 365 Defender using Advanced Hunting. The rule should alert when a user signs in from an IP address that is not in the company's approved IP range (192.168.0.0/16). Which KQL function should be used to compare the sign-in IP against the approved range?

Accepted Answer

ipv4_is_in_range(SigninIP, '192.168.0.0/16'). The correct KQL function is `ipv4_is_in_range()` because it is specifically designed to check whether an IPv4 address falls within a given CIDR range. In this scenario, the function compares the `SigninIP` field against the company's approved range `192.168.0.0/16` and returns `true` if the IP is within that range, enabling the rule to alert on out-of-range sign-ins. This function handles subnet mask calculations natively, ensuring accurate and efficient IP range matching without manual parsing.

Answer

has_any(SigninIP, dynamic(['192.168.0.0/16']))

Answer

ipv4_is_private(SigninIP)

Answer

SigninIP startswith '192.168.'

Question 6

A security analyst in Microsoft Sentinel wants to correlate Microsoft Entra ID sign-in logs with IP addresses known to be associated with a threat actor. The threat actor's IPs are stored in a custom table named 'ThreatIntelligence_IP' that is ingested daily. The analyst needs to create an analytics rule that triggers only when a sign-in occurs from one of these IPs AND when the user is not in a list of approved users (stored in another custom table 'ApprovedUsers'). Which KQL query pattern should the analyst use to achieve this correlation and filtering?

Accepted Answer

SigninLogs | join kind=inner ThreatIntelligence_IP on IPAddress | join kind=leftanti (ApprovedUsers | project UserId) on $left.UserId == $right.UserId. Option C is correct because it uses a `join kind=inner` to match sign-in logs with threat IPs, ensuring only sign-ins from known malicious IPs are considered. It then applies a `join kind=leftanti` to exclude any user who appears in the ApprovedUsers table, effectively filtering out approved users. This pattern guarantees that the rule triggers only when both conditions are met: the IP is in the threat list and the user is not approved.

Answer

SigninLogs | join ThreatIntelligence_IP on IPAddress | where UserId notin (ApprovedUsers | project UserId)

Answer

SigninLogs | where IPAddress in (ThreatIntelligence_IP | project IPAddress) and UserId !in (ApprovedUsers | project UserId)

Answer

SigninLogs | join ThreatIntelligence_IP on IPAddress | where not(UserId in (ApprovedUsers | project UserId))

Question 7

A security analyst in Microsoft Sentinel is creating a scheduled analytics rule to detect multiple failed logon attempts from the same source IP address. The rule should generate an incident only when the count of failed logons exceeds 10 within a 5-minute window. Which configuration setting is essential to limit the incident generation to this threshold?

Accepted Answer

Alert threshold set to a value of 10. The alert threshold setting in a Microsoft Sentinel scheduled analytics rule directly controls the minimum number of query results required to generate an incident. By setting the threshold to 10, the rule will only fire when the query returns more than 10 failed logon events within the 5-minute window, matching the requirement exactly.

Answer

Event grouping set to 'Group all events into a single alert'

Answer

Query scheduling set to run every 5 minutes

Answer

Entity mapping for source IP address

Question 8

A security analyst is writing a Kusto Query Language (KQL) advanced hunting query in Microsoft 365 Defender to detect lateral movement using Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). Which table should the analyst join with the DeviceNetworkEvents table to identify processes initiating outgoing RDP connections?

Accepted Answer

DeviceProcessEvents. The DeviceNetworkEvents table logs network connections, including outgoing RDP traffic (port 3389). To identify which process initiated a specific outgoing RDP connection, you must join with the DeviceProcessEvents table on DeviceId and Timestamp (or ProcessId), because DeviceProcessEvents contains the process creation details (e.g., mstsc.exe) that launched the network connection. This join reveals the parent process responsible for the lateral movement attempt.

Answer

DeviceLogonEvents

Answer

DeviceFileEvents

Answer

DeviceRegistryEvents

Question 9

A SOC analyst needs to create a custom scheduled analytics rule in Microsoft Sentinel that detects when a user attempts to sign in from an IP address not in the organization's allowlist. The rule should run every 5 minutes. Which table should the analyst query?

Accepted Answer

SigninLogs. The SigninLogs table in Microsoft Sentinel captures interactive user sign-in events, including the source IP address. Since the rule needs to detect user sign-in attempts from non-allowlisted IPs, SigninLogs is the correct table to query. It provides the necessary fields like UserPrincipalName, IPAddress, and ResultType to build the detection logic.

Answer

AADNonInteractiveUserSignInLogs

Answer

AuditLogs

Answer

AzureActivity

Question 10

A security analyst is investigating a ransomware incident and needs to find all files that were written to a specific device within a 5-minute window before the ransomware process started. The analyst knows the device name and the ransomware process start time. Which advanced hunting table and KQL operator combination would be most efficient to find the file creation events?

Accepted Answer

DeviceFileEvents with where. DeviceFileEvents is the correct table because it specifically captures file creation, modification, and deletion events on devices. Using the `where` operator to filter by device name and a timestamp range (5 minutes before the ransomware process start time) is the most efficient way to retrieve the exact file creation events needed for the investigation.

Answer

DeviceProcessEvents with join

Answer

DeviceEvents with where

Answer

DeviceImageLoadEvents with where

Question 11

A SOC analyst is creating a scheduled analytics rule in Microsoft Sentinel to detect sign-ins from IP addresses that are not in the organization's known allow list. The allow list is maintained in a custom watchlist named 'AllowedIPs'. The analyst wants the KQL query to efficiently filter out allowed IPs. Which KQL approach should the analyst use?

Accepted Answer

Use the _GetWatchlist('AllowedIPs') function and filter with the '!in' operator.. Option C is correct because the _GetWatchlist('AllowedIPs') function retrieves the watchlist content at query runtime, and combining it with the '!in' operator efficiently filters out sign-ins from IPs present in the watchlist. This approach is dynamic, meaning updates to the watchlist are automatically reflected without modifying the query, and it avoids hardcoding IPs or using inefficient row-by-row lookups.

Answer

Use the 'lookup' operator to map IPs against the watchlist.

Answer

Use a 'let' statement to define a static list of allowed IPs.

Answer

Use the 'evaluate' operator with a python script.

Question 12

A security analyst is investigating a sophisticated attack that involved multiple devices. The analyst needs to create a custom detection rule in Microsoft 365 Defender that triggers when a process with a specific SHA256 hash is executed on any device AFTER an attacker-controlled file is created on another device. Which approach should the analyst use to build this detection?

Accepted Answer

Create a custom detection rule using an advanced hunting query that joins DeviceFileEvents and DeviceProcessEvents, and schedule it in Microsoft 365 Defender.. Option A is correct because the requirement is to correlate two distinct events (file creation on one device and process execution on another) across time and devices. An advanced hunting query in Microsoft 365 Defender can join DeviceFileEvents and DeviceProcessEvents tables using a common indicator (e.g., attacker-controlled file hash) and schedule the query as a custom detection rule. This is the only native Microsoft 365 Defender approach that supports multi-device, multi-event correlation with scheduled evaluation.

Answer

Use the Microsoft 365 Defender incident creation rule to generate an incident when the behavior is observed.

Answer

Use Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules with a data connector to Microsoft 365 Defender.

Answer

Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud's workload protection alerts.

Question 13

A SOC analyst is creating a new analytics rule in Microsoft Sentinel to detect when a user account is disabled. The analyst needs to select a rule template that uses Microsoft Entra ID audit logs. Which rule type should the analyst choose?

Accepted Answer

Scheduled. A scheduled query rule is the correct choice because it allows the analyst to define a KQL query that runs on a fixed interval (e.g., every 5 minutes) against Microsoft Entra ID audit logs, which are stored in the AuditLogs table. This is the standard approach for detecting patterns like account disable events, as it provides full control over the query logic and scheduling frequency.

Answer

NRT (Near-Real-Time)

Answer

Anomaly

Answer

Fusion

Question 14

A SOC analyst wants to create a Microsoft Sentinel scheduled analytics rule that alerts when a user from a critical department (e.g., Finance) logs on from an IP address that is not in the company's approved IP address ranges. The analyst has an Azure Sentinel watchlist named 'FinanceApprovedIPs' containing the allowed IP ranges. Which KQL operator should be used in the rule's query to efficiently check if the IP address from SigninLogs falls within any of the watchlist ranges?

Accepted Answer

join kind=inner (watchlist) on $left.IPAddress $right.IPRange with condition using ipv4_is_in_range() or ipv4_lookup(). Option A is correct because the `ipv4_lookup()` function (or `ipv4_is_in_range()` used with a join) is specifically designed to efficiently check whether an IP address falls within a range defined in a watchlist. In Microsoft Sentinel, watchlists store data as tables, and `ipv4_lookup()` performs a range-based lookup using CIDR notation, which is far more efficient than string-based or exact-match operators. This allows the query to match the `IPAddress` from `SigninLogs` against the `IPRange` column in the `FinanceApprovedIPs` watchlist without iterating over every possible address.

Answer

where IPAddress has any (watchlist)

Answer

where IPAddress in (watchlist)

Answer

where IPAddress startswith (watchlist)

Question 15

A SOC team ingests Microsoft 365 Defender advanced hunting data into Microsoft Sentinel. They want to create a scheduled analytics rule that detects when a user receives more than 5 emails from an external sender containing a specific attachment name within 1 hour. Which KQL tables and approach should the analyst use?

Accepted Answer

EmailEvents and EmailAttachmentInfo; summarize count() by AccountUpn, AttachmentFileName, bin(Timestamp,1h). Option A is correct because the detection requires joining EmailEvents (which contains sender/recipient metadata) with EmailAttachmentInfo (which contains attachment file names) to filter by external senders and a specific attachment name, then using summarize count() with bin(Timestamp,1h) to group events into 1-hour windows and identify users receiving more than 5 such emails. This approach directly maps to the requirement: external sender, attachment name, user identity (AccountUpn), and time-based aggregation.

Answer

EmailEvents and EmailUrlInfo; summarize count() by SenderObjectId

Answer

EmailEvents only; filter by AttachmentFileName

Answer

EmailPostDeliveryEvents; summarize count() by RecipientEmailAddress

Question 16

An analyst is investigating a data exfiltration incident. They suspect that a user downloaded sensitive files from a SharePoint site and then uploaded them to a non-corporate cloud storage service (e.g., Dropbox) using the same device. Which combination of Advanced Hunting tables should the analyst query to correlate the SharePoint download activity with network connections to external IPs?

Accepted Answer

CloudAppEvents and DeviceNetworkEvents. CloudAppEvents logs user activities in cloud apps like SharePoint, including file downloads. DeviceNetworkEvents logs network connections from devices, including connections to external IPs. Combining these tables allows the analyst to correlate the SharePoint download event (from CloudAppEvents) with subsequent network connections to non-corporate cloud storage IPs (from DeviceNetworkEvents) on the same device, directly mapping the exfiltration path.

Answer

EmailEvents and DeviceNetworkEvents

Answer

DeviceFileEvents and DeviceNetworkEvents

Answer

CloudAppEvents and IdentityLogonEvents

Question 17

A SOC analyst is creating an automation rule in Microsoft Sentinel to trigger a playbook when a new incident is created. The analyst wants the rule to apply only to incidents that have a severity of 'High' and where the 'User' entity is present. Which condition configuration should the analyst use?

Accepted Answer

Set 'Incident severity equals High' and 'Entity type contains User'. Option B is correct because Microsoft Sentinel automation rules evaluate conditions at the incident level, not the alert level. The 'Incident severity equals High' condition filters by incident severity, and 'Entity type contains User' checks that the incident's entities include a User entity, which is required for the playbook to receive entity context.

Answer

Set 'Incident severity equals High' and 'Incident tag contains User'

Answer

Set 'Alert severity equals High' and 'Alert entity type contains User'

Answer

Set 'Incident provider equals Microsoft Sentinel' and 'Entity type contains User'

Question 18

An organization has enabled Microsoft Defender for Cloud's enhanced security features. They want to ensure that newly provisioned Azure virtual machines automatically have the built-in vulnerability assessment solution installed. Which configuration should they enable in Defender for Cloud?

Accepted Answer

Auto-provisioning of the vulnerability assessment solution. Option B is correct because Microsoft Defender for Cloud's enhanced security features include a dedicated auto-provisioning setting specifically for the built-in vulnerability assessment solution (powered by Qualys). When enabled, this setting automatically deploys the vulnerability assessment extension to all new and existing Azure VMs, ensuring continuous vulnerability scanning without manual intervention.

Answer

Auto-provisioning of the Log Analytics agent

Answer

Automatic provisioning of all security agents

Answer

Azure Policy assignment for Update Management

Question 19

A security analyst is investigating an advanced persistent threat (APT) campaign that involves lateral movement using RDP. The analyst wants to create a custom detection rule in Microsoft 365 Defender that triggers when a device remotely connects to another device via RDP (process: mstsc.exe) and, within 10 minutes, the remote device executes a suspicious script (e.g., PowerShell.exe with encoded command). Which KQL query pattern in advanced hunting should be used to correlate these events across devices?

Accepted Answer

DeviceProcessEvents | where FileName == 'mstsc.exe' | project SourceDevice = DeviceName, TimeGenerated, RemoteDevice = extract(remote device from command line) | join kind=inner (DeviceProcessEvents | where FileName == 'powershell.exe') on $left.RemoteDevice == $right.DeviceName and $left.TimeGenerated between ($right.TimeGenerated-10m .. $right.TimeGenerated). Option B is correct because it uses the `extract()` function to parse the remote device name from the `mstsc.exe` command line (e.g., `mstsc.exe /v:REMOTE_PC`), then performs an inner join with `DeviceProcessEvents` for `powershell.exe` on the condition that the remote device name matches and the `mstsc.exe` timestamp falls within a 10-minute window before the PowerShell execution. This precisely correlates the lateral movement (RDP connection) with the subsequent suspicious script execution on the target device, which is the required detection pattern.

Answer

DeviceProcessEvents | where FileName == 'mstsc.exe' | join DeviceProcessEvents on DeviceName | where (Timestamp2 - Timestamp1) between (0m..10m) and FileName == 'powershell.exe'

Answer

DeviceProcessEvents | where FileName in~ ('mstsc.exe', 'powershell.exe') and TimeGenerated > ago(1h) | summarize makelist(DeviceName) by bin(TimeGenerated, 10m)

Answer

DeviceProcessEvents | where FileName == 'mstsc.exe' | extend RemoteDevice = extract(...,1, ProcessCommandLine) | join kind=inner (DeviceProcessEvents | where FileName == 'powershell.exe') on $left.RemoteDevice == $right.DeviceName and $left.TimeGenerated between ($right.TimeGenerated - 10m .. $right.TimeGenerated)

Question 20

A SOC analyst wants to detect when a user signs in from a device that has never been used by that user before. The analyst plans to use Microsoft Sentinel with the SigninLogs table. Which KQL approach correctly identifies sign-ins from devices not previously associated with the user within the last 30 days?

Accepted Answer

Join the SigninLogs table with itself to find the earliest sign-in per user and device, then filter for those that match the earliest timestamp. Option A is correct because it uses a self-join on the SigninLogs table to identify the earliest sign-in per user-device pair within the last 30 days. By filtering for rows where the sign-in timestamp matches the earliest timestamp, the query isolates sign-ins from devices that have never been used by that user before, effectively detecting first-time device usage.

Answer

Use the _GetWatchlist function with a custom watchlist of known user-device pairs

Answer

Use the BehaviorAnalytics table which already identifies new devices

Answer

Apply the 'where DeviceId != '' and DeviceId startswith "device-"' filter to ensure the device is new