- A
Configure entity behavior analytics to automatically block the user.
Why wrong: Entity behavior analytics detects anomalies but does not perform automated remediation.
- B
Create an analytics rule that detects suspicious forwarding rules and automatically removes them.
Why wrong: Analytics rules generate alerts but do not perform remediation actions.
- C
Create an automation rule that triggers a playbook to remove the forwarding rule when an incident with the 'Phishing' tactic is created.
Automation rules can trigger playbooks that perform remediation actions like removing forwarding rules.
- D
Add the user to a watchlist that triggers an automated investigation.
Why wrong: Watchlists are for correlation and reference; they don't trigger actions.
Automate Phishing Remediation with Automation Rules and Playbooks | Microsoft Sentinel
This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of manage a security operations environment. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
You are a SOC analyst investigating a high-severity incident. The incident involves a user who received a phishing email and clicked a link. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 detected the email as phishing and blocked the URL at time of click, but a follow-up investigation reveals that the user's mailbox has suspicious forwarding rules. You need to ensure that similar incidents are automatically remediated in the future. What should you configure in Microsoft Sentinel?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Create an automation rule that triggers a playbook to remove the forwarding rule when an incident with the 'Phishing' tactic is created.
Option C is correct because Microsoft Sentinel automation rules can trigger a playbook (an Azure Logic Apps workflow) when an incident is created with a specific tactic, such as 'Phishing'. This allows automatic remediation of suspicious forwarding rules without manual intervention, ensuring similar incidents are handled consistently.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Configure entity behavior analytics to automatically block the user.
Why it's wrong here
Entity behavior analytics detects anomalies but does not perform automated remediation.
- ✗
Create an analytics rule that detects suspicious forwarding rules and automatically removes them.
Why it's wrong here
Analytics rules generate alerts but do not perform remediation actions.
- ✓
Create an automation rule that triggers a playbook to remove the forwarding rule when an incident with the 'Phishing' tactic is created.
Why this is correct
Automation rules can trigger playbooks that perform remediation actions like removing forwarding rules.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Add the user to a watchlist that triggers an automated investigation.
Why it's wrong here
Watchlists are for correlation and reference; they don't trigger actions.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates confuse the detection capability of analytics rules (Option B) with the remediation capability of automation rules and playbooks, assuming that analytics rules can directly perform actions like removing rules, when in fact they only generate alerts.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Automation rules in Microsoft Sentinel evaluate incident creation or update events and can invoke a playbook via an Azure Logic Apps connector. The playbook can use the Microsoft Graph API or Exchange Online PowerShell cmdlets (e.g., `Remove-InboxRule`) to delete suspicious forwarding rules. This integration allows for near real-time remediation, reducing the window of exposure from compromised mailboxes.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Manage a security operations environment — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Manage a security operations environment practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SC-200 questions
1,639 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Security Operations Analyst SC-200 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SC-200 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SC-200 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Manage a security operations environment practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Manage a security operations environment.
Respond to security incidents practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Respond to security incidents.
Perform threat hunting practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Perform threat hunting.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender XDR practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender XDR.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender for Cloud practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel.
SC-200 fundamentals practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 fundamentals.
SC-200 scenario practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 scenario.
SC-200 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free SC-200 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SC-200 question test?
Manage a security operations environment — This question tests Manage a security operations environment — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Create an automation rule that triggers a playbook to remove the forwarding rule when an incident with the 'Phishing' tactic is created. — Option C is correct because Microsoft Sentinel automation rules can trigger a playbook (an Azure Logic Apps workflow) when an incident is created with a specific tactic, such as 'Phishing'. This allows automatic remediation of suspicious forwarding rules without manual intervention, ensuring similar incidents are handled consistently.
What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more ways this is tested on SC-200
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. A security analyst receives a high-severity incident in Microsoft Sentinel for a user who is suspected of lateral movement. The analyst wants to automatically run a playbook that isolates the user's machine and disables their account when such an incident is created. What is the most efficient way to achieve this?
hard- A.Configure a Logic Apps trigger to poll for new incidents every minute
- B.Train analysts to manually run the playbook when they see the incident
- C.Create an analytics rule that runs a playbook as part of its alert generation
- ✓ D.Create an automation rule that triggers the playbook when the incident is created
Why D: Option D is correct because automation rules in Microsoft Sentinel are designed to trigger playbooks automatically when an incident is created, based on conditions like severity or rule name. This provides the most efficient, event-driven response without polling or manual intervention, directly addressing the requirement to isolate the machine and disable the account upon incident creation.
Keep practising
More SC-200 practice questions
- Which TWO are valid sources of evidence in a Microsoft Sentinel incident? (Choose two.)
- An organization uses Microsoft 365 Defender. During an incident, the analyst wants to automatically isolate a compromise…
- Which THREE steps are part of the incident response process when using Microsoft Sentinel?
- Refer to the exhibit. You are reviewing a Microsoft Sentinel scheduled analytics rule configured as above. An incident w…
- A security analyst is preparing to use a Jupyter notebook for threat hunting in Microsoft Sentinel. Which of the followi…
- You are investigating a ransomware incident in Microsoft Sentinel. The incident contains multiple alerts. You need to gr…
Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026
This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.