MS-900 Describe Microsoft 365 apps and services Practice Question

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

• ✗

  Microsoft To Do

  Why it's wrong here

  Microsoft To Do centers on personal productivity: it stores each user's own tasks in individual lists such as My Day and Important, and while it can display tasks assigned to you from Planner, it cannot itself assign tasks to other team members or create a shared, multi-user task board. Because there is no team workspace, an owner cannot define buckets, set separate assignees per task, or track team-wide progress; that collaborative workflow is delivered by Planner, not To Do.

• ✓

  Microsoft Planner

  Why this is correct

  Microsoft Planner is the correct workload because each plan is a shared canvas backed by a Microsoft 365 group, and every task can be assigned to a specific member of that group, given a deadline, placed in a bucket, and tracked with charts on the Plan tab. Its board, charts, and schedule views give teams a visual way to monitor progress per assignee and per bucket, and the same plan can be added as a tab in Microsoft Teams or surfaced in Outlook, making it a true collaborative task management service.

• ✗

  SharePoint

  Why it's wrong here

  SharePoint was built for content management rather than task execution: although a SharePoint site can host a Task List web part, a simple status column, or an embedded Planner view, these are either generic list structures or embedded views of another service, not native Planner workflow engines. It lacks the out-of-the-box assignment-centric features such as bucket-level workflow, automatic progress charts, and due-date timeline views that define Planner, so choosing SharePoint by itself would not meet the requirement to assign tasks and track progress as a dedicated task app.

• ✗

  Microsoft Lists

  Why it's wrong here

  Microsoft Lists is a flexible data-tracking application for building custom lists—inventory, issues, or simple task lists—with columns for assignee (person/group), due date, and status, and it supports custom views including a board view. However, it does not provide Planner's built-in progress charts, bucket-based task workflow, automatic scheduling on a timeline, or seamless group-backed assignment that makes Planner the intended tool for assigning team tasks and tracking progress; using Lists would require manually constructing those capabilities.

Go deeper

Related to this question