Courseiva
← MD-102
Full test
Question 869 of 991
Manage applications →mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that access is allowed with a warning to update the app and OS. This occurs because the app protection policy version conditions define both a minimum requirement and a warning threshold; here, the device meets the minimum OS version of 9.0 and the minimum app version of 1.5.0, but the app version exactly matches the minimum, which is above the warning level of 1.4.0, while the OS version of 9.0 is also above the warning level of 8.0—so no warning is actually triggered, meaning access is granted without any prompt. On the MD-102 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of how Intune’s app protection policies evaluate version conditions hierarchically: the warning level is a softer boundary that only triggers when a device falls below it, not when it meets or exceeds the minimum. A common trap is confusing the warning level with the minimum, so remember: minimums block access, warnings only prompt updates. Memory tip: “Min blocks, warn talks—if you meet both, you walk.”

MD-102 Manage applications Practice Question

This MD-102 practice question tests your understanding of manage applications. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.

Intune app protection policy JSON:
```json
{
  "AppProtectionPolicy": {
    "@odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.androidManagedAppProtection",
    "displayName": "Android Policy",
    "description": "Policy for Android devices",
    "periodOfflineBeforeAccessCheck": "PT12H",
    "periodOnlineBeforeAccessCheck": "PT30M",
    "allowedDataStorageLocations": ["sharePoint", "oneDriveForBusiness"],
    "exemptedAppPackages": [],
    "minimumRequiredAppVersion": "1.0.0",
    "minimumRequiredOSVersion": "9.0",
    "minimumWarningAppVersion": "2.0.0",
    "minimumWarningOSVersion": "10.0",
    "appDataEncryptionType": "whenDeviceLocked",
    "managedBrowser": "microsoftEdge",
    "deployedAppCount": 2
  }
}
```

An Android device running OS version 9.0 with app version 1.5.0 is targeted by the app protection policy in the exhibit. What is the expected behavior when the user tries to access work data?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.

Intune app protection policy JSON:
```json
{
  "AppProtectionPolicy": {
    "@odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.androidManagedAppProtection",
    "displayName": "Android Policy",
    "description": "Policy for Android devices",
    "periodOfflineBeforeAccessCheck": "PT12H",
    "periodOnlineBeforeAccessCheck": "PT30M",
    "allowedDataStorageLocations": ["sharePoint", "oneDriveForBusiness"],
    "exemptedAppPackages": [],
    "minimumRequiredAppVersion": "1.0.0",
    "minimumRequiredOSVersion": "9.0",
    "minimumWarningAppVersion": "2.0.0",
    "minimumWarningOSVersion": "10.0",
    "appDataEncryptionType": "whenDeviceLocked",
    "managedBrowser": "microsoftEdge",
    "deployedAppCount": 2
  }
}
```

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Access is allowed with a warning to update the app and OS

The app protection policy in the exhibit sets the minimum OS version to 9.0 and the minimum app version to 1.5.0, with the warning level set to OS version 8.0 and app version 1.4.0. Since the device runs OS 9.0 (meeting the minimum) and app version 1.5.0 (meeting the minimum), but the OS version is below the warning level (9.0 is not below 8.0) and the app version is below the warning level (1.5.0 is not below 1.4.0), the device actually meets both minimum requirements. However, the question states the device is targeted by the policy, and the exhibit likely shows the warning level for OS is 8.0 and for app is 1.4.0, meaning the device's OS 9.0 is above the warning level, but the app version 1.5.0 is above the warning level as well. The correct interpretation is that the device meets minimum requirements, so access is allowed, but because the app version is exactly at the minimum (not below warning), no warning is triggered. Option B is correct because the device meets all minimums, so access is allowed without any warning.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Access is blocked because the OS version is below the warning level

    Why it's wrong here

    Warning levels do not block access.

  • ✓

    Access is allowed with a warning to update the app and OS

    Why this is correct

    The user meets minimum requirements but not warning levels, so a warning is shown.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • ✗

    Access is allowed without any warning because minimum requirements are met

    Why it's wrong here

    Warning levels trigger a warning even if minimums are met.

  • ✗

    Access is blocked because the app version is below the warning level

    Why it's wrong here

    Warning levels do not block access; they show a warning.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse the 'warning level' with the 'minimum level', assuming that being below the warning level triggers a block rather than just a warning, or they misread the exhibit and think the device's versions are below the warning thresholds when they are actually above them.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    Warning levels do not block access; they show a warning.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In Microsoft Intune app protection policies, the 'minimum' version setting blocks access if the version is below that threshold, while the 'warning' version setting displays a warning to the user but still allows access if the version is between the warning and minimum levels. The policy evaluates OS and app versions independently; if either is below the minimum, access is blocked. In this scenario, both OS 9.0 and app 1.5.0 meet the minimums, and since they are above the warning levels, no warning is triggered. A subtle behavior is that if the app version is exactly equal to the warning level, it is considered at the warning threshold and a warning is shown, but here 1.5.0 is above 1.4.0.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related MD-102 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Prepare infrastructure for devices practice questions

Practise MD-102 questions linked to Prepare infrastructure for devices.

Manage and maintain devices practice questions

Practise MD-102 questions linked to Manage and maintain devices.

Manage applications practice questions

Practise MD-102 questions linked to Manage applications.

Protect devices practice questions

Practise MD-102 questions linked to Protect devices.

Deploy Windows client practice questions

Practise MD-102 questions linked to Deploy Windows client.

Manage identity and compliance practice questions

Practise MD-102 questions linked to Manage identity and compliance.

Manage, maintain, and protect devices practice questions

Practise MD-102 questions linked to Manage, maintain, and protect devices.

MD-102 fundamentals practice questions

Practise MD-102 questions linked to MD-102 fundamentals.

MD-102 scenario practice questions

Practise MD-102 questions linked to MD-102 scenario.

MD-102 troubleshooting practice questions

Practise MD-102 questions linked to MD-102 troubleshooting.

Practice this exam

Start a free MD-102 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

10 questions20 questions30 questions50 questionsTimed 30
MD-102 practice-test guide →Study guide →Browse all practice tests

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MD-102 question test?

Manage applications — This question tests Manage applications — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Access is allowed with a warning to update the app and OS — The app protection policy in the exhibit sets the minimum OS version to 9.0 and the minimum app version to 1.5.0, with the warning level set to OS version 8.0 and app version 1.4.0. Since the device runs OS 9.0 (meeting the minimum) and app version 1.5.0 (meeting the minimum), but the OS version is below the warning level (9.0 is not below 8.0) and the app version is below the warning level (1.5.0 is not below 1.4.0), the device actually meets both minimum requirements. However, the question states the device is targeted by the policy, and the exhibit likely shows the warning level for OS is 8.0 and for app is 1.4.0, meaning the device's OS 9.0 is above the warning level, but the app version 1.5.0 is above the warning level as well. The correct interpretation is that the device meets minimum requirements, so access is allowed, but because the app version is exactly at the minimum (not below warning), no warning is triggered. Option B is correct because the device meets all minimums, so access is allowed without any warning.

What should I do if I get this MD-102 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This MD-102 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MD-102 exam.