Question 12 of 999

Quick Answer

The answer is Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews. This feature directly fulfills the requirement for quarterly attestation by allowing you to configure recurring, time-bound reviews of user access to critical applications, with application owners assigned as the designated reviewers. On the Microsoft Azure Solutions Architect Expert AZ-305 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of Entra ID Governance’s core recertification workflow, often appearing as a distractor against options like Privileged Identity Management (PIM) or Terms of Use—PIM handles just-in-time elevation, not periodic attestation. A common trap is confusing the review of access with the assignment of access; remember that Access Reviews are for verification, not provisioning. Memory tip: think “Quarterly Check-Up” for Access Reviews—they are the governance stethoscope, not the prescription pad.

AZ-305 Practice Question: Design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions

This AZ-305 practice question tests your understanding of design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Your organization plans to deploy Microsoft Entra ID Governance. You need to ensure that access to critical applications is reviewed quarterly by the application owners. Which Microsoft Entra ID feature should you use?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews

Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews (Option D) is the correct feature because it enables recurring, delegated review of user access to applications, groups, or roles. By configuring an access review with quarterly frequency and assigning application owners as reviewers, you directly meet the requirement for periodic attestation of access to critical applications. This is the specific Entra ID capability designed for governance-driven access recertification.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Microsoft Entra ID Privileged Identity Management

    Why it's wrong here

    PIM focuses on privileged roles, not general application access.

  • Microsoft Entra ID Entitlement Management

    Why it's wrong here

    Entitlement Management automates access requests, not reviews.

  • Microsoft Entra ID Terms of Use

    Why it's wrong here

    Terms of Use are for user consent, not access reviews.

  • Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews

    Why this is correct

    Access Reviews enable periodic attestation of access by owners.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse Entitlement Management (which includes access packages and can trigger reviews) with the dedicated Access Reviews feature, but the question explicitly asks for the feature that ensures reviews are conducted quarterly by application owners, which is the core purpose of Access Reviews, not a secondary function of Entitlement Management.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Access Reviews in Microsoft Entra ID leverage the Microsoft Graph API to evaluate group membership or application role assignments against a review schedule. When a review is created, the system sends email notifications to reviewers and tracks their decisions (approve/deny) in the review instance; denied access is automatically removed after the review period ends. A subtle behavior is that Access Reviews can be scoped to guest users only, which is often used in hybrid identity scenarios to enforce periodic guest access cleanup.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-305 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free AZ-305 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-305 question test?

Design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions — This question tests Design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews — Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews (Option D) is the correct feature because it enables recurring, delegated review of user access to applications, groups, or roles. By configuring an access review with quarterly frequency and assigning application owners as reviewers, you directly meet the requirement for periodic attestation of access to critical applications. This is the specific Entra ID capability designed for governance-driven access recertification.

What should I do if I get this AZ-305 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This AZ-305 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-305 exam.