Courseiva
Design business continuity solutionsmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

AZ-305 Design business continuity solutions Practice Question

Which TWO actions should you take to ensure business continuity for an Azure SQL Managed Instance? (Choose two.)

⚠ Common exam trap

Watch out — candidates often confuse Azure Site Recovery (which works for IaaS VMs) with the native geo-replication and failover group capabilities of Azure SQL Managed Instance, or they mistakenly think that a same-region readable secondary or long-term retention alone satisfies business continuity requirements for a regional disaster.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Enable automated backups with a retention period that meets your RPO

Automated backups are a fundamental component of business continuity for Azure SQL Managed Instance. They provide point-in-time restore capabilities within a configurable retention period (7-35 days), directly supporting your Recovery Point Objective (RPO) by allowing you to restore to any point within that window. This ensures that data loss is minimized to the backup frequency, which is typically every 5-10 minutes for transaction log backups.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Use Azure Site Recovery to replicate the instance to another region

    Why it's wrong here

    Azure Site Recovery orchestrates disaster recovery by replicating IaaS virtual machines, not Platform-as-a-Service data services. SQL Managed Instance is a PaaS offering with its own native high availability and geo-failover mechanisms, so ASR cannot capture its transaction logs or state. Attempting to use ASR would miss the instance's internal replica topology and would not provide a consistent, point-in-time recoverable copy.

  • Configure a readable secondary replica in the same region

    Why it's wrong here

    A readable secondary replica in the same region addresses read-scale scenarios inside the same availability zone, but it does not protect against region-wide outages. For SQL Managed Instance, readable secondaries are not a manually configured DR construct; geo failover is provided instead through a failover group with a secondary instance in another region. Placing the secondary in the same region violates the cross-region requirement for business continuity.

  • Enable automated backups with a retention period that meets your RPO

    Why this is correct

    Automated backups for SQL Managed Instance enable point-in-time restore (PITR) to any point within the configured retention period, making them the foundational mechanism to meet a specified RPO. Because backups are stored in geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS) by default, they also provide a cross-region restore option if the primary region is lost. Choosing a retention period that at least matches your RPO ensures you can recover to a state no older than your recovery target.

  • Configure a failover group with a secondary instance in a different region

    Why this is correct

    Configuring a failover group with a secondary instance in a different region provides automatic geo-replication and the ability to perform a manual or automatic failover with a single connection string. This directly supports business continuity by maintaining a readable secondary in a paired region, and the RTO is measured in minutes, not hours. Failover groups are the native DR solution for SQL Managed Instance, complementing automated backups for the case of full regional outage.

  • Enable long-term retention (LTR) for backups

    Why it's wrong here

    Long-term retention (LTR) extends backup retention beyond the automated backup period (up to 10 years) to support regulatory or archival compliance, not failover or recovery-point objectives. While LTR backups can be restored, the restore process is not designed for fast, frequent recovery and does not provide automatic or manual failover. Using LTR in place of a failover group or automated PITR backups would actually increase RTO and cannot protect against the loss of recent transactions.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

This AZ-305 question is part of Courseiva's 212-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This AZ-305 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-305 exam.