hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A company runs a critical application on Azure VMs in a single region. They need to implement disaster recovery using Azure Site Recovery (ASR) with a recovery point objective (RPO) of 15 minutes and a recovery time objective (RTO) of 2 hours. The database VMs have a very high data change rate, and the company wants to minimize replication costs. They also need to ensure that in the recovery plan, database VMs start before application VMs, and a script updates DNS records after failover. Which combination of ASR configurations should they use?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

A company runs a critical application on Azure VMs in a single region. They need to implement disaster recovery using Azure Site Recovery (ASR) with a recovery point objective (RPO) of 15 minutes and a recovery time objective (RTO) of 2 hours. The database VMs have a very high data change rate, and the company wants to minimize replication costs. They also need to ensure that in the recovery plan, database VMs start before application VMs, and a script updates DNS records after failover. Which combination of ASR configurations should they use?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Enable multi-VM consistency groups and use recovery plans with manual ordering.

Multi-VM consistency groups increase complexity and costs; manual ordering does not automate the startup sequence or scripts.

B

Distractor review

Enable app-consistent replication and use deployment plans with pre- and post-actions.

App-consistent replication adds overhead and may cause unnecessary costs for high-change databases; deployment plans are not an ASR feature.

C

Distractor review

Enable replication with high churn protection and use recovery plans with availability groups.

High churn protection is not an ASR feature; availability groups are for SQL Server, not for VM startup ordering.

D

Best answer

Enable crash-consistent replication and use recovery plans with pre- and post-actions.

Crash-consistent replication meets the RPO and reduces costs. Recovery plans support pre-actions to control VM startup order and post-actions to run scripts after failover.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-305 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-305 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Enable crash-consistent replication and use recovery plans with pre- and post-actions. — For high data change rate VMs, crash-consistent replication is sufficient to meet the 15-minute RPO while keeping costs lower than app-consistent replication. ASR recovery plans allow adding pre-actions (to start VMs in order) and post-actions (to run scripts). Multi-VM consistency groups are not necessary here since crash-consistent replication provides adequate RPO and avoids additional overhead. Recovery plans with manual ordering would not automate the startup order or script execution.

What should I do if I get this AZ-305 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.