Question 2,095 of 2,152
IPv6 First Hop SecuritymediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

300-410 IPv6 First Hop Security Practice Question

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of ipv6 first hop security. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO statements about IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) Inspection are true? (Choose TWO.)

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

It validates Neighbor Solicitation and Neighbor Advertisement messages against the IPv6 snooping binding table.

Option A is correct because IPv6 ND Inspection validates Neighbor Solicitation (NS) and Neighbor Advertisement (NA) messages against the IPv6 snooping binding table. This table is built by gleaning information from DHCPv6 messages or by using the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery protocol itself, ensuring that only legitimate ND messages from trusted sources are forwarded, preventing attacks like Neighbor Cache exhaustion or address spoofing.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • It validates Neighbor Solicitation and Neighbor Advertisement messages against the IPv6 snooping binding table.

    Why this is correct

    ND Inspection checks NS and NA messages against the binding table to prevent spoofing attacks.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • It can be configured to rate-limit ND packets on a per-interface basis.

    Why this is correct

    Rate-limiting is a key feature of ND Inspection to prevent DoS attacks using excessive ND messages.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • It prevents rogue DHCPv6 servers from assigning malicious addresses.

    Why it's wrong here

    This is the function of DHCPv6 Guard, not ND Inspection; ND Inspection focuses on ND messages, not DHCP.

  • It uses a prefix list to determine which source addresses are allowed.

    Why it's wrong here

    ND Inspection uses the binding table, not a prefix list; prefix lists are used in other features like RA Guard.

  • It is enabled globally and cannot be applied on a per-interface basis.

    Why it's wrong here

    ND Inspection is enabled per-interface using the 'ipv6 nd inspection' command, not just globally.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the distinction between IPv6 First Hop Security features, and the trap here is confusing ND Inspection (which validates ND messages) with DHCPv6 Guard (which blocks rogue DHCPv6 servers) or RA Guard (which uses prefix lists).

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    ND Inspection is enabled per-interface using the 'ipv6 nd inspection' command, not just globally.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, IPv6 ND Inspection intercepts NS and NA messages and checks the source IPv6 address and link-layer address against the binding table, which is populated by DHCPv6 snooping or by gleaning from ND messages. In a real-world scenario, if an attacker sends a forged NA claiming to be the default router, ND Inspection drops the packet because the binding table does not contain that mapping, thus preventing a man-in-the-middle attack. The feature also supports rate-limiting to mitigate DoS attacks that flood ND packets.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

IPv6 First Hop Security — This question tests IPv6 First Hop Security — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: It validates Neighbor Solicitation and Neighbor Advertisement messages against the IPv6 snooping binding table. — Option A is correct because IPv6 ND Inspection validates Neighbor Solicitation (NS) and Neighbor Advertisement (NA) messages against the IPv6 snooping binding table. This table is built by gleaning information from DHCPv6 messages or by using the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery protocol itself, ensuring that only legitimate ND messages from trusted sources are forwarded, preventing attacks like Neighbor Cache exhaustion or address spoofing.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 300-410 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.