Question 774 of 1,152
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and MitigationsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SY0-701 Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of threats, vulnerabilities, and mitigations. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. A key principle to apply: compensating controls mitigate risk when primary controls are absent or delayed.. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A scanner reports a critical vulnerability on an internal Linux server. The administrator verifies the package is installed, but the vulnerable code path is only present in a plugin that has been disabled and removed from the service startup. The server cannot be patched until a vendor maintenance window next month. What is the best next step?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Create a time-limited exception and apply compensating controls until patching is possible

Option B is correct because the vulnerability exists in a disabled plugin, meaning the attack surface is reduced but not eliminated; residual risk remains if the plugin is re-enabled or if other dependencies are affected. Creating a time-limited exception with compensating controls (e.g., firewall rules, file permissions, SELinux policies) allows the organization to formally accept the risk until the vendor patch is applied, which aligns with standard vulnerability management processes.

Key principle: Compensating controls mitigate risk when primary controls are absent or delayed.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Ignore the finding because the scanner is clearly wrong

    Why it's wrong here

    The package is present, so the finding should not be dismissed without documentation, validation, and risk review.

  • Create a time-limited exception and apply compensating controls until patching is possible

    Why this is correct

    A temporary exception with compensating controls balances business constraints and security while the team schedules a proper fix.

    Related concept

    Compensating controls mitigate risk when primary controls are absent or delayed.

  • Reinstall the disabled plugin so the scanner output matches the running configuration

    Why it's wrong here

    Reinstalling the plugin would increase exposure instead of reducing risk, even if it satisfied the scan result visually.

  • Expose the server to the internet for faster monitoring and patch testing

    Why it's wrong here

    Placing the server on the internet would significantly increase risk and is not a valid remediation strategy.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates assume a disabled plugin means zero risk, but the exam expects you to recognize that the package is still installed and could be exploited if re-enabled, so formal risk acceptance with compensating controls is required rather than ignoring or re-enabling the plugin.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In Linux, a package may contain multiple binaries or libraries, and simply disabling a plugin (e.g., via systemctl mask or removing a .so file from a load path) does not remove the package from the system; the vulnerable code still resides on disk and could be executed if the plugin is accidentally re-enabled or triggered by another process. Compensating controls might include using iptables to block the plugin’s listening port, setting file permissions to 000 on the plugin binary, or applying a kernel-level seccomp filter to prevent execution. This scenario mirrors real-world cases like the Dirty Pipe vulnerability (CVE-2022-0847) where a disabled feature still left the kernel module present.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Compensating controls mitigate risk when primary controls are absent or delayed.
  • Time-limited exceptions are formal, documented deviations from security policy.
  • Risk assessment involves understanding both likelihood and impact of a vulnerability.
  • Vulnerability management requires validation and appropriate remediation strategies.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Compensating controls mitigate risk when primary controls are absent or delayed.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security team runs a vulnerability scan on a web application and discovers an unpatched SQL injection flaw. The team prioritises remediation by CVSS score — critical flaws are patched within 24 hours, high within 7 days. Questions like this test whether you understand vulnerability management processes, scanning tools, and remediation prioritisation.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review compensating controls mitigate risk when primary controls are absent or delayed., then practise related SY0-701 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — This question tests Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — Compensating controls mitigate risk when primary controls are absent or delayed..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Create a time-limited exception and apply compensating controls until patching is possible — Option B is correct because the vulnerability exists in a disabled plugin, meaning the attack surface is reduced but not eliminated; residual risk remains if the plugin is re-enabled or if other dependencies are affected. Creating a time-limited exception with compensating controls (e.g., firewall rules, file permissions, SELinux policies) allows the organization to formally accept the risk until the vendor patch is applied, which aligns with standard vulnerability management processes.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Review compensating controls mitigate risk when primary controls are absent or delayed., then practise related SY0-701 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Compensating controls mitigate risk when primary controls are absent or delayed.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SY0-701 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.