Question 926 of 1,152
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and MitigationsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SY0-701 Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of threats, vulnerabilities, and mitigations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A security analyst observes repeated outbound traffic from a single workstation to a known malicious IP address. The workstation's anti-malware software has reported no alerts, and the user claims to have only downloaded software from the company's approved application store. Which type of malware most likely explains this behavior?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Trojan horse

The Trojan horse is correct because it is a type of malware that disguises itself as legitimate software, often downloaded from trusted sources like an approved application store, to bypass security controls. Once installed, it can silently establish outbound connections to a command-and-control (C2) server, such as the known malicious IP address observed, without triggering anti-malware alerts if the Trojan is not yet in the signature database. This matches the scenario where the user downloaded from an approved store, the anti-malware reported no alerts, and the workstation is communicating with a malicious IP.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Ransomware

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. Ransomware typically encrypts files and demands a ransom, often displaying a visible notification. It does not usually remain silent while performing outbound communication to a C2 server without user awareness.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question where a user reports encrypted files and a ransom note demanding payment, with outbound traffic to a command-and-control server, would make ransomware correct.

  • Rootkit

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. A rootkit is designed to conceal its presence and maintain privileged access. While it could communicate externally, its primary goal is stealth within the system rather than generating observable outbound traffic, and it is less likely to be downloaded from an approved app store.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A rootkit would be correct in a scenario where a security analyst discovers that malware has hidden itself from the operating system and anti-malware tools, and the user reports no unusual activity, but system performance is degraded or unauthorized access is detected.

  • Trojan horse

    Why this is correct

    Correct. A Trojan horse masquerades as benign software, often from a seemingly trusted source. It can evade signature-based anti-malware and silently establish outbound connections to a malicious IP for command-and-control, data exfiltration, or further payload delivery.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Polymorphic malware

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. Polymorphic malware changes its code signature each time it replicates, which helps evade signature detection. However, it is not typically delivered via an approved app store, and its behavior is not uniquely characteristic of the described outbound traffic scenario.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A security analyst observes repeated outbound traffic to a known malicious IP, and the anti-malware software fails to detect the malware despite updated signatures. The malware changes its code each time it replicates, evading signature-based detection. Which type of malware is most likely responsible?

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The SY0-701 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Trojan horseCorrect answer

Why this is correct

Correct. A Trojan horse masquerades as benign software, often from a seemingly trusted source. It can evade signature-based anti-malware and silently establish outbound connections to a malicious IP for command-and-control, data exfiltration, or further payload delivery.

RansomwareWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Ransomware typically encrypts files and demands payment, often with visible alerts or ransom notes, not silent outbound traffic to a known malicious IP without alerts.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question where a user reports encrypted files and a ransom note demanding payment, with outbound traffic to a command-and-control server, would make ransomware correct.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may associate any malicious outbound traffic with ransomware, overlooking that ransomware usually shows clear signs of infection rather than stealthy communication.

RootkitWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A rootkit is designed to hide its presence and maintain privileged access, but it does not typically generate repeated outbound traffic to a known malicious IP. The observed behavior suggests a trojan horse, which masquerades as legitimate software to establish command-and-control communication.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A rootkit would be correct in a scenario where a security analyst discovers that malware has hidden itself from the operating system and anti-malware tools, and the user reports no unusual activity, but system performance is degraded or unauthorized access is detected.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may choose rootkit because it is known for stealth and evading detection, similar to the scenario where anti-malware reported no alerts, but they overlook that rootkits do not typically cause repeated outbound traffic to a malicious IP.

Polymorphic malwareWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Polymorphic malware changes its code to evade signature-based detection, but the question states the workstation's anti-malware software reported no alerts, which could also be due to a trojan. However, the key clue is that the user downloaded software from an approved store, suggesting a trojan disguised as legitimate software, not polymorphic behavior.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A security analyst observes repeated outbound traffic to a known malicious IP, and the anti-malware software fails to detect the malware despite updated signatures. The malware changes its code each time it replicates, evading signature-based detection. Which type of malware is most likely responsible?

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may associate 'no alerts from anti-malware' with malware that evades detection, and polymorphic malware is known for evading signature-based detection, leading them to overlook the social engineering aspect of a trojan.

Analysis generated from the official SY0-701blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may confuse a rootkit's stealth capabilities with the Trojan's social engineering vector, overlooking that the approved store download is a classic Trojan delivery method, not a rootkit's typical infection path.

Trap categories for this question

  • Scenario analysis trap

    Incorrect. Polymorphic malware changes its code signature each time it replicates, which helps evade signature detection. However, it is not typically delivered via an approved app store, and its behavior is not uniquely characteristic of the described outbound traffic scenario.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Trojan horses often use techniques like DLL sideloading or process hollowing to execute malicious code within a trusted process, making outbound HTTPS or DNS queries to a C2 server while appearing as normal traffic. In a real-world scenario, a Trojan like Emotet has been distributed through fake software updates or legitimate-looking installers, establishing persistent C2 channels that evade signature-based detection by using encrypted or obfuscated payloads.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — This question tests Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Trojan horse — The Trojan horse is correct because it is a type of malware that disguises itself as legitimate software, often downloaded from trusted sources like an approved application store, to bypass security controls. Once installed, it can silently establish outbound connections to a command-and-control (C2) server, such as the known malicious IP address observed, without triggering anti-malware alerts if the Trojan is not yet in the signature database. This matches the scenario where the user downloaded from an approved store, the anti-malware reported no alerts, and the workstation is communicating with a malicious IP.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SY0-701 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.