mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

NetFlow shows one workstation initiating SMB and WinRM sessions to 25 internal servers within 12 minutes, followed by a spike in Kerberos authentication requests and attempts to access admin shares. The user says they only opened an invoice spreadsheet. What is the most likely attacker objective?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

NetFlow shows one workstation initiating SMB and WinRM sessions to 25 internal servers within 12 minutes, followed by a spike in Kerberos authentication requests and attempts to access admin shares. The user says they only opened an invoice spreadsheet. What is the most likely attacker objective?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Distributed denial-of-service activity against the internal network.

The traffic pattern is targeted at multiple hosts for authentication and remote execution, not flooding a service.

B

Best answer

Lateral movement using compromised credentials to pivot across the environment.

The pattern of SMB, WinRM, Kerberos, and admin-share activity strongly suggests an attacker is using one compromised workstation to move laterally and reach additional systems. That behavior matches post-compromise pivoting, often with stolen credentials or remote execution tooling. The invoice spreadsheet is likely the initial infection vector.

C

Distractor review

Port scanning from an external attacker trying to enumerate exposed services.

This is internal, authenticated-looking east-west traffic rather than an external reconnaissance scan.

D

Distractor review

DNS tunneling used to bypass content filtering and exfiltrate data.

DNS tunneling usually produces unusual DNS query patterns, not broad SMB, WinRM, and Kerberos activity.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Lateral movement using compromised credentials to pivot across the environment. — The most likely objective is lateral movement after a workstation compromise. The combination of SMB, WinRM, Kerberos spikes, and admin-share access attempts indicates the attacker is trying to pivot to other internal systems and execute remotely. This is classic post-compromise tradecraft and often follows phishing or malware execution from a document attachment. The priority is to contain the source host and assess credential exposure. Why others are wrong: A denial-of-service attack would show volume and availability impact rather than authenticated movement across many hosts. Port scanning is typically unauthenticated reconnaissance, often from outside the network, not coordinated internal access attempts. DNS tunneling would show unusual name-resolution behavior and small data streams over DNS, not repeated SMB and WinRM sessions to many servers.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.