easymultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Employees in a lobby report that their phones automatically connected to a wireless network named "CorpWiFi." Soon after, they were prompted to sign in through a web page that did not look like the normal company portal. What attack is most likely?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Employees in a lobby report that their phones automatically connected to a wireless network named "CorpWiFi." Soon after, they were prompted to sign in through a web page that did not look like the normal company portal. What attack is most likely?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Bluetooth pairing attack

Bluetooth pairing attacks target Bluetooth connections, not Wi-Fi networks and captive portals. The prompt is describing wireless LAN behavior instead.

B

Best answer

Evil twin

An evil twin is a rogue wireless access point that imitates a legitimate SSID so victims connect to it by mistake. The fake network name and suspicious sign-in page strongly suggest a malicious clone of the real Wi-Fi.

C

Distractor review

NFC relay attack

NFC relay attacks involve near-field communication and can extend short-range card or device interactions. They do not match a Wi-Fi network connection and web login page.

D

Distractor review

MAC flooding

MAC flooding targets switch tables by overwhelming them with addresses. The scenario focuses on a fake wireless network, not switch table exhaustion.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Evil twin — The correct answer is evil twin because the attacker is impersonating a legitimate wireless network by using the same or a very similar SSID. Users connect because the name looks trusted, then the fake access point can capture credentials or redirect them to a malicious portal. On Security+, the combination of an unexpected connection and a fake login page is a strong indicator of an evil twin attack. Why others are wrong: Bluetooth pairing attacks involve Bluetooth devices, not Wi-Fi associations. NFC relay attacks use near-field communications and are unrelated to a wireless LAN sign-in page. MAC flooding is a switch attack and does not explain a fake SSID or captive portal. The scenario is specifically about a malicious Wi-Fi clone.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.