hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

EDR on a workstation shows winword.exe spawning powershell.exe with hidden, no-profile, and encoded arguments. No new executable is written to disk. Minutes later, a scheduled task creation is blocked, but the same host continues making HTTPS requests to a cloud IP address. Which malware category best fits this behavior?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

EDR on a workstation shows winword.exe spawning powershell.exe with hidden, no-profile, and encoded arguments. No new executable is written to disk. Minutes later, a scheduled task creation is blocked, but the same host continues making HTTPS requests to a cloud IP address. Which malware category best fits this behavior?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Trojan, because the malicious activity likely started from a user-opening event.

A trojan often arrives disguised as legitimate software, but this stem emphasizes memory-only execution and living-off-the-land tooling rather than a simple fake application dropper.

B

Distractor review

Worm, because the host is making repeated outbound network connections.

Worms self-replicate across systems, usually exploiting network services. Outbound beaconing alone does not prove replication or lateral spread.

C

Distractor review

Rootkit, because the process is using hidden commands and network connections.

Rootkits are designed to hide presence at the kernel or boot level. Hidden PowerShell and no disk artifact point more strongly to fileless execution than stealthy kernel tampering.

D

Best answer

Fileless attack, because the payload is executed in memory using legitimate scripting tools and leaves little on disk.

Fileless attack is the best fit because the sequence uses trusted built-in tools, encoded PowerShell, and no obvious executable drop on disk. The suspicious behavior happens in memory and through script interpretation, which makes detection harder than with traditional malware files. The blocked scheduled task and later HTTPS beaconing are consistent with in-memory execution and persistence attempts after initial delivery.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Fileless attack, because the payload is executed in memory using legitimate scripting tools and leaves little on disk. — This is a classic fileless attack pattern. The user starts execution from a document, PowerShell runs with hidden and encoded flags, and no new binary is dropped to disk. That combination shows abuse of legitimate tools and memory-based payload execution. The later network beaconing suggests the attacker is maintaining command-and-control while trying to remain unobtrusive to file-based scanners. Why others are wrong: Trojan is too generic and usually implies a malicious program disguised as something useful. Worm does not fit because there is no evidence of self-propagation. Rootkit is about stealth and hiding system components, but the key clue here is fileless, script-based execution with no disk artifact.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.