Courseiva
General Security ConceptshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SY0-701 General Security Concepts Practice Question

Exhibit

VPN and application audit
08:04 user rpatel authenticated from home laptop
08:05 VPN tunnel established
08:06 request: GET /finance/q4-forecast.xlsx
08:06 policy: allowed because prior login within 12 hours
08:07 note: device posture not checked; no step-up MFA

Based on the exhibit, which security principle should the team strengthen to reduce the chance that stolen credentials alone provide access to sensitive data?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often confuse zero trust with defense in depth, assuming multiple security layers automatically verify every request, when in fact defense in depth can still rely on a single persistent trust decision (like a VPN session) that stolen credentials can exploit.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Zero trust, because every request should be re-evaluated instead of relying on the earlier VPN login.

The exhibit shows a scenario where a VPN session grants persistent access to sensitive data without re-authentication. Zero trust is correct because it mandates continuous verification of every request, not just the initial VPN login, so stolen credentials alone would not provide ongoing access to sensitive data. This principle enforces micro-segmentation and per-request authorization, directly addressing the vulnerability of credential theft.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Least privilege, because the user should only have the minimum file permissions needed.

    Why it's wrong here

    Least privilege is important, but the exhibit shows the bigger issue is trust being granted after one successful login. The user is not receiving excessive file permissions inside the application; instead, the access decision is too permissive over time and location.

  • Zero trust, because every request should be re-evaluated instead of relying on the earlier VPN login.

    Why this is correct

    Zero trust fits the exhibit because access is being allowed based on an earlier authentication event and network location alone. A zero-trust design would re-evaluate each request using factors such as device health, identity, and context instead of assuming the session is safe for 12 hours.

  • Need-to-know, because all finance data should be hidden from anyone outside the department.

    Why it's wrong here

    Need-to-know limits information to what a person requires for their role, but the exhibit is focused on stale trust decisions after authentication. The problem is not only who can know the data; it is that the session remains trusted without rechecking the user or device.

  • Defense in depth, because multiple layers are always better than one control.

    Why it's wrong here

    Defense in depth is a valuable design idea, but this exhibit highlights a trust model problem rather than missing layers. The environment already has a VPN and application controls; the weakness is that one login is being treated as sufficient for continued access.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every SY0-701 question from scratch — 1,013 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.