The answer is compensating control, because the jump host requirement provides an alternate safeguard when the target application cannot natively enforce MFA. In this scenario, the payroll server lacks built-in multi-factor authentication support, so the jump host acts as a mandatory intermediary that enforces MFA before granting access, effectively compensating for the application’s security gap. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this concept tests your understanding of how compensating controls differ from preventive, detective, or corrective controls—a common trap is confusing a compensating control with a workaround, but the key distinction is that a compensating control is an officially approved alternative that meets the same security objective, not a bypass. Remember the memory tip: “Compensate for the gap, don’t bypass the map”—if a primary control is infeasible, a compensating control fills the gap without removing the requirement.
SY0-701 General Security Concepts Practice Question
This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of general security concepts. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Exhibit
Legacy payroll application notes:
- Vendor confirms the admin console does not support MFA or SSO.
- Direct inbound access to TCP/8443 is blocked from user VLANs.
- Administrators must connect to jump host JH-02.
- JH-02 requires MFA, records all sessions, and forwards admin traffic to PAY-LEG-01.
- The target application itself cannot be modified before end of support.
Based on the exhibit, which control type best describes the jump host requirement?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue: "best"
Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.
Legacy payroll application notes:
- Vendor confirms the admin console does not support MFA or SSO.
- Direct inbound access to TCP/8443 is blocked from user VLANs.
- Administrators must connect to jump host JH-02.
- JH-02 requires MFA, records all sessions, and forwards admin traffic to PAY-LEG-01.
- The target application itself cannot be modified before end of support.
A
Preventive control, because the jump host blocks unauthorized access before it reaches the payroll server.
Why wrong: A preventive control stops or reduces an event before it happens, but the key issue here is substitution for a missing feature on the legacy application. The jump host does add blocking, yet its main purpose is to compensate for the payroll console's inability to enforce MFA directly. That makes the design broader than a simple preventive filter.
B
Detective control, because session recording helps the team discover misuse after the fact.
Why wrong: Session recording does help with investigation, but the scenario is not asking about the recording feature alone. The essential design decision is that administrators must use a separate, hardened access path because the target system cannot support MFA itself. A detective control would only reveal activity; it would not replace the missing application control.
C
Compensating control, because the jump host provides an alternate safeguard when the application cannot enforce MFA directly.
The jump host is a compensating control because it reduces risk by providing an alternate security measure when the original control cannot be implemented on the legacy payroll application. MFA, logging, and session recording on the jump host help offset the application's limitation without requiring a risky replacement. The goal is risk reduction through a substitute safeguard.
D
Directive control, because the administrators are being instructed to use a specific access path.
Why wrong: Directive controls tell users what they must do through policy, training, or guidance. Although the rule does instruct administrators, the scenario focuses on the technical safeguard that replaces a missing control in the application. The jump host is not just a rule or reminder; it is an enforced security mechanism that compensates for the legacy constraint.
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Compensating control, because the jump host provides an alternate safeguard when the application cannot enforce MFA directly.
The jump host is implemented as a compensating control because the payroll server's application cannot natively enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA). Instead of leaving the server unprotected, the jump host provides an alternative security layer by requiring MFA at the jump host level, thereby compensating for the application's limitation. This aligns with the NIST definition of compensating controls as alternative safeguards that mitigate risks when primary controls are infeasible.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
✗
Preventive control, because the jump host blocks unauthorized access before it reaches the payroll server.
Why it's wrong here
A preventive control stops or reduces an event before it happens, but the key issue here is substitution for a missing feature on the legacy application. The jump host does add blocking, yet its main purpose is to compensate for the payroll console's inability to enforce MFA directly. That makes the design broader than a simple preventive filter.
✗
Detective control, because session recording helps the team discover misuse after the fact.
Why it's wrong here
Session recording does help with investigation, but the scenario is not asking about the recording feature alone. The essential design decision is that administrators must use a separate, hardened access path because the target system cannot support MFA itself. A detective control would only reveal activity; it would not replace the missing application control.
✓
Compensating control, because the jump host provides an alternate safeguard when the application cannot enforce MFA directly.
Why this is correct
The jump host is a compensating control because it reduces risk by providing an alternate security measure when the original control cannot be implemented on the legacy payroll application. MFA, logging, and session recording on the jump host help offset the application's limitation without requiring a risky replacement. The goal is risk reduction through a substitute safeguard.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
✗
Directive control, because the administrators are being instructed to use a specific access path.
Why it's wrong here
Directive controls tell users what they must do through policy, training, or guidance. Although the rule does instruct administrators, the scenario focuses on the technical safeguard that replaces a missing control in the application. The jump host is not just a rule or reminder; it is an enforced security mechanism that compensates for the legacy constraint.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates confuse the jump host's session recording (a detective feature) with the primary reason for its deployment, which is to compensate for the lack of MFA on the payroll server.
Trap categories for this question
Scenario analysis trap
Session recording does help with investigation, but the scenario is not asking about the recording feature alone. The essential design decision is that administrators must use a separate, hardened access path because the target system cannot support MFA itself. A detective control would only reveal activity; it would not replace the missing application control.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Compensating controls are often used when a primary control (e.g., application-level MFA) cannot be implemented due to technical constraints, such as legacy software or vendor limitations. In practice, the jump host acts as a bastion host, typically using SSH or RDP with MFA (e.g., via RADIUS or TOTP) to authenticate administrators before they can initiate a separate session to the payroll server. This layered approach ensures that even if the payroll server lacks MFA, the jump host enforces it, satisfying compliance requirements like PCI DSS 8.3.1.
KKey Concepts to Remember
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
→Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
→Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.
Related glossary terms
Concepts from this question explained
These glossary pages explain the core terms tested in this SY0-701 question in full detail.
General Security Concepts — This question tests General Security Concepts — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Compensating control, because the jump host provides an alternate safeguard when the application cannot enforce MFA directly. — The jump host is implemented as a compensating control because the payroll server's application cannot natively enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA). Instead of leaving the server unprotected, the jump host provides an alternative security layer by requiring MFA at the jump host level, thereby compensating for the application's limitation. This aligns with the NIST definition of compensating controls as alternative safeguards that mitigate risks when primary controls are infeasible.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.