Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped
Exhibit
Vendor onboarding summary: - Service: Cloud-based document translation platform - Data handled: Internal policy drafts and limited employee contact details - Existing contract terms: Standard uptime clause only - Security concerns: Vendor does not currently promise breach notification timing, security contact escalation, or the right to review independent assurance reports - Business note: The vendor is needed for a pilot with non-sensitive documents only
Based on the exhibit, which contract change would most directly reduce the organization's third-party response risk?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.
A
Best answer
Add a breach notification timeframe and a right-to-review assurance clause in the contract.
These clauses directly improve the organization's ability to respond if the vendor is compromised. Notification timing reduces delay in containment and response, while assurance review rights support ongoing third-party oversight and risk evaluation.
B
Distractor review
Ask the vendor to provide a color logo and updated marketing brochure for the pilot.
Marketing materials do not improve response readiness or security oversight. They have no effect on incident notification, evidence, or accountability.
C
Distractor review
Allow the vendor to start first and decide later whether to add security terms.
Starting without security terms increases exposure and weakens leverage. The organization may lose the chance to require meaningful protections once the service is in use.
D
Distractor review
Replace the pilot with a purely internal spreadsheet process to avoid any contract review.
Avoiding the vendor may reduce exposure, but it does not answer the contract risk identified in the exhibit. The question asks for the most direct contractual improvement to third-party response capability.
Common exam trap
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Technical deep dive
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
- Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
- Underline the problem statement mentally.
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Security+ security operations questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ security operations questions.
Security+ zero trust questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ zero trust questions.
Security+ authentication factors questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ authentication factors questions.
More questions from this exam
Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.
Question 1
A laptop is suspected of being used in a malware incident. It is still powered on and connected to Wi-Fi. What should the responder do before shutting it down?
Question 2
An employee reports a ransomware note on a file server. The server is still powered on, shares are still being accessed, and management wants service restored as quickly as possible. What should the incident response team do first?
Question 3
An employee reports a ransomware note on a finance laptop. The laptop is still powered on, connected to Wi-Fi, and the user says they were just working in a spreadsheet. Management wants the fastest safe response that also preserves evidence. What should the responder do first?
Question 4
You are handed a company laptop suspected in an insider theft case. Legal says the evidence may be needed in court. Which action best preserves admissibility?
Question 5
A developer wants to reduce the risk of SQL injection in a new customer search form. Which two changes are the best mitigations? Select two.
Question 6
A branch office uses a flat LAN, and a compromise on one user workstation could spread quickly to finance systems. Management wants finance workstations isolated from general users, but finance staff still need access to a central finance application and network printer. What is the best design change?
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Add a breach notification timeframe and a right-to-review assurance clause in the contract. — The most direct way to reduce third-party response risk is to make the vendor contractually commit to timely breach notification and provide security assurance review rights. Those terms help the organization detect, assess, and respond to vendor incidents faster, and they create leverage for ongoing oversight. Uptime language alone does not address security response, while marketing materials or delaying security review would not reduce the actual risk exposure. Why others are wrong: Option B is irrelevant to incident response and oversight. Option C creates avoidable exposure by accepting the service before securing basic protections. Option D avoids the issue rather than improving the vendor relationship or contract controls, and it does not address the actual third-party risk in the exhibit.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.
Discussion
Loading comments…
Sign in to join the discussion.