hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

Current backup design:
- Production file server backs up nightly at 23:00 to NAS-Backup over SMB.
- NAS-Backup is mounted read/write to the file server 24x7.
- Weekly copy job replicates NAS contents to cloud object storage.
- Backup credentials are shared with the server admin group.
- Last restore test: 14 months ago.
Incident summary:
- Ransomware encrypted production files and then encrypted the NAS share using the same credentials.

Based on the exhibit, which change best improves recovery resilience against a repeat ransomware incident?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Based on the exhibit, which change best improves recovery resilience against a repeat ransomware incident?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Keep the current design and add more NAS storage capacity.

More capacity does not improve survivability. The backup target is still online, writable, and reachable with the same credentials.

B

Distractor review

Move the NAS to the same subnet as the file server for faster backups.

Putting the backup target closer to production may improve speed, but it increases exposure to the same compromise path.

C

Best answer

Use an immutable or offline backup copy that production credentials cannot modify.

The incident showed that the attacker could encrypt both production and the backup share because the backup target stayed online and writable. An immutable or offline copy breaks that dependency and prevents the same credentials from destroying recovery data. In ransomware recovery, backup survivability matters more than convenience, so this change gives the strongest resilience improvement.

D

Distractor review

Shorten the backup retention period to reduce storage use.

Reducing retention may save space, but it also reduces recovery options and does not protect backups from encryption.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Use an immutable or offline backup copy that production credentials cannot modify. — The best improvement is to use an immutable or offline backup copy that production credentials cannot modify. The exhibit shows a classic ransomware failure mode: the backup repository was mounted and reachable, so the same compromise path could destroy both live data and backups. A protected copy, ideally offline or immutable, breaks that chain and gives the business a recoverable source even if production is fully encrypted. Why others are wrong: Adding storage or changing subnet placement does not solve the real weakness: the backups remain writable and exposed. Shortening retention makes recovery harder, not easier. The key operational lesson is that backup media must survive the incident, not just exist during normal operations. Survivable backups are essential for ransomware resilience.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.