Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped
Exhibit
Change control evidence: - CHG-8842: "Allow vendor IP range for maintenance window" - Requested: 2026-04-18 09:10 - Reviewed by CAB: Approved 2026-04-18 11:40 - Implemented: 2026-04-18 22:05 - Post-change validation: Firewall logs show only the approved destination was opened - Separate email: "Looks fine to me" from engineer after implementation
Based on the exhibit, which artifact is the strongest evidence that the firewall change was reviewed and approved before implementation?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.
A
Distractor review
The engineer's post-implementation email, because it confirms someone checked the change.
A post-change email is informal and does not prove formal approval happened before deployment.
B
Distractor review
The firewall logs, because they show the rule was applied successfully on the device.
Logs prove the change took effect, but they do not prove it was reviewed and authorized in advance.
C
Best answer
The change request record with CAB approval timestamp and implementation time.
This is the best evidence because it shows formal review and approval occurred before the change was implemented. Auditors want controlled, time-stamped proof of authorization, not just technical confirmation that the firewall rule changed or an informal email afterward. The change record directly supports compliance with change management requirements.
D
Distractor review
The vendor's maintenance notice, because it explains why the rule was needed.
The vendor notice may justify the request, but it does not show internal review, approval, or governance.
Common exam trap
Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization
Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.
Technical deep dive
How to think about this question
This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Authentication checks who the user is.
- Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
- Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
- AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.
TExam Day Tips
- Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
- Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
- Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Security+ security operations questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ security operations questions.
Security+ zero trust questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ zero trust questions.
Security+ authentication factors questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ authentication factors questions.
More questions from this exam
Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.
Question 1
A laptop is suspected of being used in a malware incident. It is still powered on and connected to Wi-Fi. What should the responder do before shutting it down?
Question 2
An employee reports a ransomware note on a file server. The server is still powered on, shares are still being accessed, and management wants service restored as quickly as possible. What should the incident response team do first?
Question 3
An employee reports a ransomware note on a finance laptop. The laptop is still powered on, connected to Wi-Fi, and the user says they were just working in a spreadsheet. Management wants the fastest safe response that also preserves evidence. What should the responder do first?
Question 4
You are handed a company laptop suspected in an insider theft case. Legal says the evidence may be needed in court. Which action best preserves admissibility?
Question 5
A developer wants to reduce the risk of SQL injection in a new customer search form. Which two changes are the best mitigations? Select two.
Question 6
A branch office uses a flat LAN, and a compromise on one user workstation could spread quickly to finance systems. Management wants finance workstations isolated from general users, but finance staff still need access to a central finance application and network printer. What is the best design change?
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Authentication checks who the user is.
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: The change request record with CAB approval timestamp and implementation time. — The change request record with the CAB approval timestamp is the strongest evidence because it proves formal review and authorization occurred before implementation. The exhibit includes both the approval time and the deployment time, which is exactly what an auditor needs to see. Post-change emails and firewall logs are useful supporting artifacts, but they do not by themselves establish proper change governance. Why others are wrong: An engineer's email is informal and happens after the fact, so it is weak audit evidence. Firewall logs show a technical result, not management approval. A vendor maintenance notice may explain why the change was requested, but it does not prove the organization reviewed and approved the change through its own control process.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.
Discussion
Loading comments…
Sign in to join the discussion.