Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped
Exhibit
Email security investigation for user amiller - User submitted credentials on a fake sign-in page at 08:22 - Password was reset at 08:35 - Active sessions were revoked at 08:36 - Mailbox audit now shows: * Inbox rule: 'FinanceDocs' forwards any message with 'invoice' to external address redacted@proton.example * OAuth consent granted to unknown application 'QuickDocs Sync' * Deleted Items folder contains no suspicious messages Help desk confirms the user still has access to the mailbox after reset.
Based on the exhibit, what should the team do next after the account has been contained?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.
A
Distractor review
Close the incident because the password reset removed the attacker from the environment.
Resetting the password is only one containment step. Persistence mechanisms can still remain in the mailbox and token store.
B
Best answer
Remove mailbox persistence, revoke all tokens and app consent, then monitor for reentry.
The exhibit shows post-compromise persistence through a forwarding rule and unauthorized OAuth consent. After containment, the team must eradicate those artifacts, revoke any remaining tokens or sessions, and verify that no attacker-controlled application retains access. That sequence moves the response from containment into eradication and prepares the account for safe recovery and monitoring.
C
Distractor review
Reimage the user's laptop before reviewing mailbox settings.
The evidence points to a mailbox compromise, not an endpoint infection. Reimaging the laptop does not address the forwarding rule or OAuth app.
D
Distractor review
Restore the mailbox from backup to remove the forwarding rule and keep the user productive.
Restoring a mailbox can be disruptive and may reintroduce unwanted content. It also does not replace the need to investigate and remove the attacker access path.
Common exam trap
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Technical deep dive
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
- Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
- Underline the problem statement mentally.
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Security+ security operations questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ security operations questions.
Security+ zero trust questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ zero trust questions.
Security+ authentication factors questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ authentication factors questions.
More questions from this exam
Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.
Question 1
A laptop is suspected of being used in a malware incident. It is still powered on and connected to Wi-Fi. What should the responder do before shutting it down?
Question 2
An employee reports a ransomware note on a file server. The server is still powered on, shares are still being accessed, and management wants service restored as quickly as possible. What should the incident response team do first?
Question 3
An employee reports a ransomware note on a finance laptop. The laptop is still powered on, connected to Wi-Fi, and the user says they were just working in a spreadsheet. Management wants the fastest safe response that also preserves evidence. What should the responder do first?
Question 4
You are handed a company laptop suspected in an insider theft case. Legal says the evidence may be needed in court. Which action best preserves admissibility?
Question 5
A developer wants to reduce the risk of SQL injection in a new customer search form. Which two changes are the best mitigations? Select two.
Question 6
A branch office uses a flat LAN, and a compromise on one user workstation could spread quickly to finance systems. Management wants finance workstations isolated from general users, but finance staff still need access to a central finance application and network printer. What is the best design change?
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Remove mailbox persistence, revoke all tokens and app consent, then monitor for reentry. — The next step is to eradicate remaining mailbox persistence by removing the forwarding rule, revoking the unauthorized OAuth consent, and invalidating any remaining tokens or sessions. The password reset and session revocation have contained the initial access, but attacker-created persistence can survive those actions. Security operations must remove those artifacts before declaring recovery complete and then monitor for reentry. Why others are wrong: Closing the case now would ignore active persistence and could allow the attacker back in. Reimaging the laptop treats the wrong asset because the compromise is centered on the mailbox and cloud session. Restoring the mailbox from backup is unnecessary and risky when the specific malicious settings can be removed directly. Eradication comes before recovery.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.
Discussion
Loading comments…
Sign in to join the discussion.