Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped
Exhibit
C:\Downloads> certutil -hashfile CU-2026-02.msu SHA256 SHA256 hash of CU-2026-02.msu: 9f2c3a1b8d4e0f77c0d2e6b5f0a4b1c8d9e2f3a4b5c6d7e8f9a0b1c2d3e4f5a6 Vendor portal published hash: 9f2c3a1b8d4e0f77c0d2e6b5f0a4b1c8d9e2f3a4b5c6d7e8f9a0b1c2d3e4f5a6b7
Based on the exhibit, what should the administrator do next?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.
A
Distractor review
Install the update because a longer hash means the file is newer.
A longer-looking hash does not mean the file is newer or safer. The published value and the computed value do not match, so the file cannot be trusted for installation. Installing it would ignore the integrity check.
B
Best answer
Re-download the update from the trusted source and verify the hash again.
A hash mismatch means the local file does not match the vendor-published value. The safest next step is to obtain a fresh copy from a trusted source and compare the hash again. That helps determine whether the original download was corrupted in transit or tampered with before deployment.
C
Distractor review
Rename the file to match the vendor’s naming convention and retry installation.
The filename has no effect on the cryptographic hash. Renaming the file does not resolve the mismatch and does not prove the content is authentic. The administrator must validate the actual bytes, not the label attached to them.
D
Distractor review
Disable SHA-256 verification because patch files often change after download.
Disabling verification would remove the very integrity check designed to catch corruption or tampering. Patch files should not change after a proper download from a trusted vendor source. The mismatch is a warning sign, not a reason to ignore the check.
Common exam trap
Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic
NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.
Technical deep dive
How to think about this question
NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
- PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
- Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
- NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.
TExam Day Tips
- Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
- Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
- Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Security+ security operations questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ security operations questions.
Security+ zero trust questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ zero trust questions.
Security+ authentication factors questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ authentication factors questions.
More questions from this exam
Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.
Question 1
A laptop is suspected of being used in a malware incident. It is still powered on and connected to Wi-Fi. What should the responder do before shutting it down?
Question 2
An employee reports a ransomware note on a file server. The server is still powered on, shares are still being accessed, and management wants service restored as quickly as possible. What should the incident response team do first?
Question 3
An employee reports a ransomware note on a finance laptop. The laptop is still powered on, connected to Wi-Fi, and the user says they were just working in a spreadsheet. Management wants the fastest safe response that also preserves evidence. What should the responder do first?
Question 4
You are handed a company laptop suspected in an insider theft case. Legal says the evidence may be needed in court. Which action best preserves admissibility?
Question 5
A developer wants to reduce the risk of SQL injection in a new customer search form. Which two changes are the best mitigations? Select two.
Question 6
A branch office uses a flat LAN, and a compromise on one user workstation could spread quickly to finance systems. Management wants finance workstations isolated from general users, but finance staff still need access to a central finance application and network printer. What is the best design change?
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Re-download the update from the trusted source and verify the hash again. — The correct action is to re-download the update from a trusted source and verify the hash again. The exhibit shows a SHA-256 mismatch between the local file and the vendor’s published value, which means the downloaded file cannot be considered trustworthy. Hashing is being used for integrity validation, so the administrator should not install the update until the contents match the expected value. Why others are wrong: Installing the update would ignore a clear integrity failure. Renaming the file changes nothing about its contents, so it cannot fix the mismatch. Disabling hash verification removes an important protection and would make tampering or corruption harder to detect. The proper response is to replace the file with a known-good copy and verify it again.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.
Discussion
Loading comments…
Sign in to join the discussion.