mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

Network capture summary:

Host 10.20.14.25 sends ARP requests for 10.20.14.1
Multiple ARP replies received:
10.20.14.1 is-at 02:42:ac:11:00:05
10.20.14.1 is-at 02:42:ac:11:00:05
10.20.14.1 is-at 66:77:88:99:aa:bb
Client gateway cache alternates between the legitimate gateway MAC and 66:77:88:99:aa:bb every few seconds.
Users report brief certificate warnings when opening internal sites.

Based on the exhibit, what network attack is most likely occurring on the office LAN?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Based on the exhibit, what network attack is most likely occurring on the office LAN?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

ARP poisoning, because a rogue system is sending false layer 2 address mappings.

ARP poisoning is the best answer because the capture shows false ARP replies mapping the gateway IP to a different MAC address. The alternating gateway cache entries and certificate warnings are consistent with traffic being redirected through an attacker in a man-in-the-middle position.

B

Distractor review

Replay attack, because the same ARP reply appears multiple times.

A replay attack typically reuses captured authentication or transaction data. The repeated ARP replies here are not evidence of replayed credentials; they indicate address spoofing on the local network.

C

Distractor review

Denial of service, because users notice certificate warnings.

A DoS attack aims to overwhelm resources and make services unavailable. The exhibit shows traffic redirection and address manipulation, not a flood or outage condition.

D

Distractor review

DNS poisoning, because the users cannot reach internal sites cleanly.

DNS poisoning affects name resolution records, not the ARP cache. The evidence is at layer 2, where an IP address is mapped to the wrong MAC address on the LAN.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: ARP poisoning, because a rogue system is sending false layer 2 address mappings. — The correct answer is ARP poisoning. The host is receiving forged ARP replies that cause the gateway IP to resolve to a rogue MAC address. That can redirect traffic through an attacker, which explains the brief certificate warnings and the changing cache entries. In a switched LAN, this is a common technique for local man-in-the-middle interception. Why others are wrong: Replay attacks reuse captured traffic, usually for authentication or transactions, but this log shows address spoofing instead. DoS attacks focus on availability through flooding or resource exhaustion, which is not the behavior described. DNS poisoning happens at name resolution, while the exhibit clearly shows ARP cache manipulation on the local subnet. The clues point to ARP poisoning specifically.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.