Courseiva
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and MitigationsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SY0-701 Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations Practice Question

Exhibit

Network capture summary:

Host 10.20.14.25 sends ARP requests for 10.20.14.1
Multiple ARP replies received:
10.20.14.1 is-at 02:42:ac:11:00:05
10.20.14.1 is-at 02:42:ac:11:00:05
10.20.14.1 is-at 66:77:88:99:aa:bb
Client gateway cache alternates between the legitimate gateway MAC and 66:77:88:99:aa:bb every few seconds.
Users report brief certificate warnings when opening internal sites.

Based on the exhibit, what network attack is most likely occurring on the office LAN?

⚠ Common exam trap

Many exam-takers confuse ARP poisoning with DNS poisoning because both involve false mappings, but ARP poisoning operates at layer 2 (MAC addresses) while DNS poisoning operates at the application layer (domain names), and the exhibit's focus on MAC address mappings clearly points to ARP.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

ARP poisoning, because a rogue system is sending false layer 2 address mappings.

ARP poisoning is the correct answer because the exhibit shows a rogue system sending unsolicited ARP replies that map the gateway's IP address to the attacker's MAC address. This causes traffic destined for the gateway to be redirected to the attacker, enabling man-in-the-middle interception. The attack exploits the lack of authentication in ARP, allowing false layer 2 address mappings to corrupt the ARP cache of other hosts on the LAN.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ARP poisoning, because a rogue system is sending false layer 2 address mappings.

    Why this is correct

    ARP poisoning is the best answer because the capture shows false ARP replies mapping the gateway IP to a different MAC address. The alternating gateway cache entries and certificate warnings are consistent with traffic being redirected through an attacker in a man-in-the-middle position.

  • Replay attack, because the same ARP reply appears multiple times.

    Why it's wrong here

    A replay attack requires capturing legitimate authentication or transaction data and retransmitting it to trick a system into granting access or completing a duplicate action. Here, the repeated ARP replies are not replayed captured data; each frame is a fresh forged, unsolicited reply associating the gateway IP with the attacker's MAC address. The duplication is just the attacker re-poisoning the cache to override genuine entries, not a replay of an established valid exchange.

  • Denial of service, because users notice certificate warnings.

    Why it's wrong here

    A denial of service attack is designed to exhaust resources, such as bandwidth, CPU, or memory, so that legitimate users cannot access a service. Certificate warnings in this exhibit are merely a symptom of the attacker's machine inserting itself into the TLS connection and presenting its own certificate, not evidence of a flood or outage. Since traffic is still flowing through the attacker to the intended destination, availability is not impaired; the attack compromises confidentiality and integrity via man-in-the-middle interception.

  • DNS poisoning, because the users cannot reach internal sites cleanly.

    Why it's wrong here

    DNS poisoning corrupts name resolution data, such as A or AAAA records, causing a host to connect to a malicious IP address when it queries a domain name. The exhibit shows manipulation at the data-link layer, where the ARP cache is overwritten so that the gateway's IP maps to the attacker's MAC address; DNS resolution itself returns the correct IP. The 'cannot reach internal sites cleanly' symptom comes from the attacker intercepting and re-encrypting traffic, not from an incorrect DNS response, so DNS poisoning is the wrong layer of attack.

Quick reference

Access Control Model Comparison

ModelAcronymWho Controls Access?Best For
Discretionary Access ControlDACResource ownerSmall teams, file shares
Mandatory Access ControlMACSystem / security labelsClassified govt / military
Role-Based Access ControlRBACAdministrator (via roles)Enterprise environments
Attribute-Based Access ControlABACPolicy engine (user + resource attributes)Fine-grained, dynamic policies
Rule-Based Access ControlRuBACSystem rules / ACLsFirewall rules, network ACLs

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every SY0-701 question from scratch — 1,013 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.