hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

Host: finance-lap07
10:22:11  winword.exe spawned powershell.exe -enc <redacted>
10:22:14  powershell.exe created C:\Users\ana\AppData\Roaming\rclone.exe
10:24:02  file rename activity: 184 files changed to *.locked
10:24:09  outbound SMB connections to 10.20.4.18 and 10.20.4.19
10:25:01  EDR status: endpoint still connected to corporate VPN
User report: 'My shared files stopped opening and the folder names changed.'

Based on the exhibit, what is the best immediate action for the SOC or IR team?

A finance workstation shows evidence of a macro-launched script, followed by file renaming and lateral SMB traffic to two other hosts. The team has not yet determined the full scope of the incident.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Based on the exhibit, what is the best immediate action for the SOC or IR team?

A finance workstation shows evidence of a macro-launched script, followed by file renaming and lateral SMB traffic to two other hosts. The team has not yet determined the full scope of the incident.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Isolate the host from the network and revoke its remote access to stop further spread.

The workstation shows active compromise with file encryption behavior and outbound lateral movement. Immediate containment should stop additional SMB propagation and protect neighboring systems before deeper analysis begins.

B

Distractor review

Restore the workstation from backup immediately before preserving any evidence.

Immediate restoration could destroy forensic evidence and does not stop the attacker from continuing lateral movement elsewhere.

C

Distractor review

Run a vulnerability scan against the subnet to see whether the malware exploited an unpatched service.

That may help later in root cause analysis, but it is not the priority while the compromise is still active.

D

Distractor review

Notify users to ignore the issue until the next maintenance window because the incident is likely self-limiting.

The logs show ongoing malicious activity, so waiting would increase business impact and spread risk significantly.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Isolate the host from the network and revoke its remote access to stop further spread. — The correct immediate action is containment. The exhibit shows active encryption-like behavior, a suspicious script launched from a document, and SMB connections to other internal hosts, which suggests the threat is still moving. Isolating the endpoint and revoking its remote connectivity helps prevent further spread while the team preserves evidence for later eradication and recovery steps. In incident response, stopping damage comes before rebuilding systems. Why others are wrong: Option B is premature because restoring before containment and evidence collection can erase useful artifacts and allow the attacker to persist elsewhere. Option C is useful only after the threat is contained; scanning the subnet does not stop active spread. Option D is unsafe because the behavior is not self-limiting, and delaying action would likely increase the scope of compromise.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.