hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

Host: eng-lt-44
Containment status: network quarantined

Registry artifact:
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\Updater = C:\Users\maria\AppData\Roaming\update.exe

Scheduled task:
TaskName: SysMaint
Action: C:\Users\maria\AppData\Roaming\update.exe /svc
Trigger: every 30 minutes

File hash:
update.exe SHA256 matches known malware family 'QuillDoor'

User impact:
- Browser pop-ups observed earlier
- No confirmed encryption
- No evidence of additional hosts compromised

Based on the exhibit, what is the best eradication decision after containment?

A quarantined endpoint was found to have a malicious startup item and a scheduled task. The team has already isolated it from the network and preserved memory for analysis.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Based on the exhibit, what is the best eradication decision after containment?

A quarantined endpoint was found to have a malicious startup item and a scheduled task. The team has already isolated it from the network and preserved memory for analysis.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Delete only the update.exe file and reconnect the host once the user confirms it is working.

Removing one file may leave persistence mechanisms in place and can reintroduce the malware quickly.

B

Best answer

Remove persistence artifacts and rebuild the endpoint from a known-good image before returning it to service.

The host contains a malicious executable plus two persistence mechanisms, so cleanup must remove more than the payload file. Reimaging from trusted media provides the most reliable eradication path, especially when the malware family is already identified and the machine has been quarantined. This reduces the chance of hidden remnants, registry persistence, or tampered system components surviving the response effort.

C

Distractor review

Restore network connectivity now because no encryption was observed.

The absence of encryption does not mean the endpoint is clean; persistence artifacts still exist.

D

Distractor review

Change the DNS servers for the entire enterprise to block the malware domain.

DNS changes might reduce callback traffic, but they do not eradicate the infected endpoint or its persistence.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Remove persistence artifacts and rebuild the endpoint from a known-good image before returning it to service. — The best eradication approach is to rebuild the endpoint from a known-good image after removing persistence artifacts from the incident record. The exhibit shows a confirmed malicious executable, a Run key, and a scheduled task, which means simple file deletion is not sufficient. Reimaging is the most reliable way to ensure the system returns to a trusted state before recovery and user reactivation. Why others are wrong: Option A is incomplete because it ignores two persistence mechanisms that could relaunch the malware. Option C is unsafe because the host remains compromised even without observed encryption. Option D may reduce outbound communications, but it does not clean the endpoint or eliminate the malicious startup behavior.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.