Question 132 of 1,152
General Security ConceptshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is detective control because a file integrity monitor, or FIM, identifies unauthorized changes after they have occurred and alerts the SOC. It works by comparing current file hashes against a known good baseline; when a hash mismatch is detected, the tool reports the change rather than blocking or reversing it. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this concept tests your ability to distinguish control types by their timing—detective controls find incidents post-facto, while preventive controls stop them beforehand. A common trap is confusing FIM with a preventive tool like an access control list, but remember that FIM only detects, not prevents. For a quick memory tip: think “FIM finds the fingerprint after the fact,” linking the hash comparison to its detective role.

SY0-701 General Security Concepts Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of general security concepts. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

File Integrity Monitor alert:
Host: WEB-03
Path: /etc/ssh/sshd_config
Time: 02:18:44
Old SHA-256: 7f2a9c8d2b0f9c7e6a0c...
New SHA-256: 91cd1f3b84d7e2a7f44b...
Action taken: alert sent to SOC; no rollback or automatic block occurred

SOC note:
An unauthorized change was detected during the overnight review.

Based on the exhibit, what control type is the file integrity monitor providing?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Exhibit

File Integrity Monitor alert:
Host: WEB-03
Path: /etc/ssh/sshd_config
Time: 02:18:44
Old SHA-256: 7f2a9c8d2b0f9c7e6a0c...
New SHA-256: 91cd1f3b84d7e2a7f44b...
Action taken: alert sent to SOC; no rollback or automatic block occurred

SOC note:
An unauthorized change was detected during the overnight review.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Detective control, because the tool identifies the unauthorized change and alerts the SOC.

A file integrity monitor (FIM) operates by comparing current file hashes against a known good baseline. When it detects a hash mismatch, it generates an alert to the Security Operations Center (SOC). This is a detective control because it identifies and reports the unauthorized change after it has occurred, rather than preventing or automatically correcting it.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Preventive control, because the file monitor stopped the change from occurring.

    Why it's wrong here

    A preventive control would have blocked or stopped the unauthorized change before it completed. In the exhibit, the system did not prevent the modification; it detected the change afterward and sent an alert. Because no rollback or blocking occurred, the monitor is not functioning primarily as a preventive control.

  • Detective control, because the tool identifies the unauthorized change and alerts the SOC.

    Why this is correct

    Detective control is correct because the tool notices that a protected file changed and notifies the security team. It does not stop the change or restore the original configuration automatically. That means its role is to discover suspicious activity so analysts can investigate and respond. The recorded hashes and alert timing clearly show post-event detection.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Corrective control, because the monitor automatically fixed the configuration after the change.

    Why it's wrong here

    Corrective controls repair or restore something after a problem is found. In the exhibit, there is no automatic fix, rollback, or restoration. The system only raised an alert to the SOC. Since the configuration remains changed until a person responds, this is not a corrective mechanism.

  • Directive control, because the alert tells administrators what they should review next.

    Why it's wrong here

    Directive controls guide behavior through policy, standards, or instructions. An alert can influence response, but the technical purpose of this tool is to identify configuration drift. The function shown in the exhibit is event detection, not policy guidance. The existence of an alert does not turn the control into a directive one.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse the alerting mechanism of a detective control with the action of a preventive or corrective control, mistakenly thinking that because the tool 'monitors' it must be preventing or fixing changes.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    Directive controls guide behavior through policy, standards, or instructions. An alert can influence response, but the technical purpose of this tool is to identify configuration drift. The function shown in the exhibit is event detection, not policy guidance. The existence of an alert does not turn the control into a directive one.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

File integrity monitoring tools typically use cryptographic hashing algorithms such as SHA-256 or SHA-512 to compute a baseline hash of critical files. On subsequent scans, the tool recalculates the hash and compares it to the baseline; any mismatch triggers an alert. In real-world scenarios, FIM is often used to monitor system binaries, configuration files, and registry keys for signs of compromise, but it cannot prevent the initial write operation because the file system allows writes by default unless additional access controls are enforced.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

General Security Concepts — This question tests General Security Concepts — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Detective control, because the tool identifies the unauthorized change and alerts the SOC. — A file integrity monitor (FIM) operates by comparing current file hashes against a known good baseline. When it detects a hash mismatch, it generates an alert to the Security Operations Center (SOC). This is a detective control because it identifies and reports the unauthorized change after it has occurred, rather than preventing or automatically correcting it.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SY0-701 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.