hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

File Integrity Monitor alert:
Host: WEB-03
Path: /etc/ssh/sshd_config
Time: 02:18:44
Old SHA-256: 7f2a9c8d2b0f9c7e6a0c...
New SHA-256: 91cd1f3b84d7e2a7f44b...
Action taken: alert sent to SOC; no rollback or automatic block occurred

SOC note:
An unauthorized change was detected during the overnight review.

Based on the exhibit, what control type is the file integrity monitor providing?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Based on the exhibit, what control type is the file integrity monitor providing?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Preventive control, because the file monitor stopped the change from occurring.

A preventive control would have blocked or stopped the unauthorized change before it completed. In the exhibit, the system did not prevent the modification; it detected the change afterward and sent an alert. Because no rollback or blocking occurred, the monitor is not functioning primarily as a preventive control.

B

Best answer

Detective control, because the tool identifies the unauthorized change and alerts the SOC.

Detective control is correct because the tool notices that a protected file changed and notifies the security team. It does not stop the change or restore the original configuration automatically. That means its role is to discover suspicious activity so analysts can investigate and respond. The recorded hashes and alert timing clearly show post-event detection.

C

Distractor review

Corrective control, because the monitor automatically fixed the configuration after the change.

Corrective controls repair or restore something after a problem is found. In the exhibit, there is no automatic fix, rollback, or restoration. The system only raised an alert to the SOC. Since the configuration remains changed until a person responds, this is not a corrective mechanism.

D

Distractor review

Directive control, because the alert tells administrators what they should review next.

Directive controls guide behavior through policy, standards, or instructions. An alert can influence response, but the technical purpose of this tool is to identify configuration drift. The function shown in the exhibit is event detection, not policy guidance. The existence of an alert does not turn the control into a directive one.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Detective control, because the tool identifies the unauthorized change and alerts the SOC. — The file integrity monitor is a detective control because it identifies that a protected configuration file changed and then alerts the SOC. It does not stop the modification from happening, and it does not automatically repair the system. Its value is in revealing unauthorized or unexpected change so the team can investigate and respond quickly. Why others are wrong: The exhibit explicitly says the change was detected and only an alert was sent, so it was not preventive. There was no rollback or restoration, so it was not corrective. Directive controls are policies and guidance, not monitoring tools. The key clue is that the system observed the event after it occurred and reported it for human action.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.