hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

Current controls on the finance share:
- SMB signing enabled
- Weekly access review
- Nightly backups to immutable storage
- Antivirus scans at 02:00

Incident: a valid VPN account was used to access 40,000 files in 8 minutes and copy them to a local drive.
Goal: detect unauthorized bulk access quickly before exfiltration completes.

Based on the exhibit, what additional control is the best fit?

Current controls on the finance share: - SMB signing enabled - Weekly access review - Nightly backups to immutable storage - Antivirus scans at 02:00

Incident: a valid VPN account was used to access 40,000 files in 8 minutes and copy them to a local drive. Goal: detect unauthorized bulk access quickly before exfiltration completes.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Based on the exhibit, what additional control is the best fit?

Current controls on the finance share: - SMB signing enabled - Weekly access review - Nightly backups to immutable storage - Antivirus scans at 02:00

Incident: a valid VPN account was used to access 40,000 files in 8 minutes and copy them to a local drive. Goal: detect unauthorized bulk access quickly before exfiltration completes.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Add file access auditing with alert thresholds forwarded to the SIEM.

Auditing is a detective control that can identify abnormal bulk reads quickly and trigger timely response.

B

Distractor review

Increase the backup schedule from nightly to hourly.

More backups help recovery, but they do not detect suspicious file access or exfiltration in real time.

C

Distractor review

Rename the share to a less obvious name.

Security by obscurity does not detect misuse and does not stop a valid account from accessing files.

D

Distractor review

Disable SMB signing so the file transfer runs faster.

Disabling signing weakens integrity protections and does not address the core detection gap.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Add file access auditing with alert thresholds forwarded to the SIEM. — The exhibit shows preventive and recovery controls already exist, but the environment lacks visibility into suspicious file access behavior. File access auditing forwarded to the SIEM is the best fit because it is a detective control that can identify unusual bulk reads, large export behavior, and access patterns inconsistent with normal use. That gives defenders a chance to respond before exfiltration completes. It directly addresses the stated goal rather than only improving restoration or convenience. Why others are wrong: Increasing backup frequency helps with restoration after an incident, but it does not detect the incident while it is happening. Renaming the share is only obscurity and will not stop a valid VPN account from reading data. Disabling SMB signing would reduce transport integrity and create a weaker configuration without improving detection. The question asks for the best fit to detect abnormal bulk access, which is auditing plus SIEM alerting.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.