Courseiva
Question 698 of 1,013
Security ArchitecturehardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

SY0-701 Security Architecture Practice Question

An organization stores full payment card numbers, analysts need the last four digits for investigation, and the backup team is worried about ransomware and stolen backup media. Which three controls best address these requirements? Select three.

⚠ Common exam trap

A common mix-up: candidates confuse tokenization with masking or encryption, assuming any obfuscation technique is sufficient, but tokenization is the only option that irreversibly removes the full PAN from analytics systems while preserving the last four digits for investigation.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Tokenize primary account numbers before they reach analytics, reporting, or test systems.

Tokenization replaces the full primary account number (PAN) with a unique token that retains the last four digits for analytics, so analysts can perform investigations without exposing sensitive cardholder data. This directly satisfies PCI DSS requirements for minimizing the use of full PANs in non-production environments, while preserving the utility needed for fraud analysis or reporting.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Tokenize primary account numbers before they reach analytics, reporting, or test systems.

    Why this is correct

    Tokenization replaces sensitive values with nonusable substitutes while preserving business usefulness for many workflows. Analysts can still correlate records, but exposed reports and test data no longer reveal the true card number. This is especially valuable for payment data because it reduces the number of environments that ever handle the actual secret value.

  • Store backups on the same production storage array to simplify restore operations.

    Why it's wrong here

    Storing backups on the same production storage array collapses the separation between live data and recovery copies. A single hardware fault, corruption event, or ransomware attack that encrypts the array will likely destroy both source and backup, making recovery impossible. Additionally, administrative credentials for the array grant access to both, so an attacker who compromises the storage layer can disable or delete backups before deployment. Effective backup resilience requires physically or logically separate storage with independent access controls, ideally immutable or air-gapped copies.

  • Encrypt backup sets with keys managed outside the backup repository itself.

    Why this is correct

    If backup media is stolen, strong encryption prevents the attacker from reading the contents. Separating key management from the repository reduces the chance that access to the backup system automatically exposes the encryption keys. This is a standard safeguard for backups that may be transported, replicated, or otherwise removed from the primary data center.

  • Use simple masking only in spreadsheets while leaving the source database unchanged.

    Why it's wrong here

    Simply redacting PANs in spreadsheets leaves every other copy of the full card number untouched, including the production database, transaction logs, and downstream data warehouses. Analysts can bypass the masked spreadsheet entirely by querying the source system directly, and any developer or tester with database access still sees real cardholder data. Masking must be applied consistently at the data layer through dynamic data masking or tokenization, not as a disconnected export step. This approach also creates a false sense of compliance while failing to reduce PCI DSS scope.

  • Keep one immutable or air-gapped backup copy to resist ransomware and theft.

    Why this is correct

    An immutable or air-gapped backup copy protects recovery data from tampering, deletion, and encryption by ransomware. It also limits the impact of a stolen online backup system because the recovery copy is separated from active write access. This is a core resilience control when backup compromise is part of the threat model.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.