- A
Reply with the codes because the request appears urgent
Why wrong: Urgency is a common social engineering tactic, not proof that the request is legitimate.
- B
Verify the request through an approved channel and report the message
Verifying through a trusted channel and reporting the email protects the organization from a likely fraud attempt.
- C
Forward the email to coworkers so they can watch for similar messages
Why wrong: Forwarding suspicious email spreads risk and may encourage unsafe handling by other users.
- D
Delete the email and ignore it without telling anyone
Why wrong: Deleting it removes evidence and prevents the security team from warning others or investigating.
SY0-701 Security Program Management and Oversight Practice Question
This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of security program management and oversight. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
An employee receives an email that says, 'This is the CEO. Buy gift cards now and reply with the codes before the meeting starts.' What should the employee do?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Verify the request through an approved channel and report the message
Option B is correct because the email exhibits classic social engineering indicators—spoofed authority, urgency, and a request for non-standard financial transactions (gift cards). The employee must verify the request through an approved communication channel (e.g., a phone call to the CEO's known number) and report the message to the security team for incident response. This aligns with security policy for phishing and business email compromise (BEC) prevention, as per NIST SP 800-61 and organizational security awareness training.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Reply with the codes because the request appears urgent
Why it's wrong here
Urgency is a common social engineering tactic, not proof that the request is legitimate.
- ✓
Verify the request through an approved channel and report the message
Why this is correct
Verifying through a trusted channel and reporting the email protects the organization from a likely fraud attempt.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Forward the email to coworkers so they can watch for similar messages
Why it's wrong here
Forwarding suspicious email spreads risk and may encourage unsafe handling by other users.
- ✗
Delete the email and ignore it without telling anyone
Why it's wrong here
Deleting it removes evidence and prevents the security team from warning others or investigating.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates may mistake the urgency and authority in the email as legitimate, choosing Option A, but CompTIA tests the principle that any request for sensitive actions (gift cards, wire transfers, credential changes) must be verified through a separate, trusted channel regardless of apparent sender identity.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
BEC attacks often use email spoofing via SMTP header manipulation (e.g., setting the From field to the CEO's address without SPF/DKIM/DMARC validation) or compromised accounts. Modern email security gateways (e.g., Proofpoint, Mimecast) analyze header anomalies, but attackers may bypass them by using lookalike domains (e.g., ceo@cornpany.com vs. ceo@company.com). The employee's verification step should involve out-of-band communication (e.g., a phone call or in-person check) to confirm the request, as email alone cannot be trusted.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
An employee at a financial services firm receives an email that appears to come from the IT helpdesk, asking them to reset their password via a link. The link leads to a convincing fake portal that harvests credentials. Security teams use phishing simulations and security-awareness training to reduce this attack vector. Questions like this test whether you can identify social engineering techniques and appropriate controls.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Security Program Management and Oversight — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SY0-701 questions
1,152 questions across all exam domains
- →
Security+ SY0-701 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SY0-701 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
General Security Concepts practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to General Security Concepts.
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations.
Security Architecture practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Architecture.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Operations.
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Program Management and Oversight.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free SY0-701 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Security Program Management and Oversight — This question tests Security Program Management and Oversight — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Verify the request through an approved channel and report the message — Option B is correct because the email exhibits classic social engineering indicators—spoofed authority, urgency, and a request for non-standard financial transactions (gift cards). The employee must verify the request through an approved communication channel (e.g., a phone call to the CEO's known number) and report the message to the security team for incident response. This aligns with security policy for phishing and business email compromise (BEC) prevention, as per NIST SP 800-61 and organizational security awareness training.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.