- A
Complete the transfer because it came from an executive
Why wrong: Email display names can be faked, so authority alone is not proof of legitimacy.
- B
Reply to the email asking if it is real
Why wrong: Replying to the same email keeps you inside the suspicious communication channel.
- C
Verify the request using a separate trusted method
The safest first action is to verify the request through a separate trusted channel, such as calling the CEO using a known internal number or checking with a supervisor. This helps confirm whether the message is legitimate without relying on the suspicious email itself. Urgent money requests are a common social engineering tactic, so independent verification is essential.
- D
Forward it to the whole department for awareness
Why wrong: Sharing the email widely may spread confusion and does not confirm whether it is legitimate.
Quick Answer
The answer is to verify the request using a separate trusted method. This is correct because the email exhibits classic signs of a business email compromise (BEC) attack, where the sender address is spoofed or slightly altered, and the urgency is designed to bypass critical thinking. The technical concept here is out-of-band verification, which means confirming the request through a channel independent of the potentially compromised email system—such as a phone call to the CEO or a direct message on a known internal platform. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this scenario tests your ability to recognize social engineering red flags and apply the principle of non-repudiation through verification. A common trap is to reply to the email or click a link, but the correct first action for a business email compromise is always to break the communication chain. Memory tip: BEC = Break, Email, Call—break the email loop and call to confirm.
SY0-701 General Security Concepts Practice Question
This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of general security concepts. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
An employee receives an email that appears to be from the CEO and asks for an urgent wire transfer. The sender address is slightly different from the real company address. What is the best first action?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"best"Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.
Clue:
"first"Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Verify the request using a separate trusted method
Option C is correct because the email exhibits classic signs of a business email compromise (BEC) attack, where the sender address is spoofed or slightly altered. Verifying the request through a separate, trusted method—such as calling the CEO directly or using a known internal communication channel—bypasses any compromised email system and confirms the legitimacy of the request. This aligns with the principle of out-of-band verification, which is a key defense against phishing and social engineering.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Complete the transfer because it came from an executive
Why it's wrong here
Email display names can be faked, so authority alone is not proof of legitimacy.
- ✗
Reply to the email asking if it is real
Why it's wrong here
Replying to the same email keeps you inside the suspicious communication channel.
- ✓
Verify the request using a separate trusted method
Why this is correct
The safest first action is to verify the request through a separate trusted channel, such as calling the CEO using a known internal number or checking with a supervisor. This helps confirm whether the message is legitimate without relying on the suspicious email itself. Urgent money requests are a common social engineering tactic, so independent verification is essential.
Clue confirmation
The clue words "best", "first" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Forward it to the whole department for awareness
Why it's wrong here
Sharing the email widely may spread confusion and does not confirm whether it is legitimate.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
CompTIA often tests the concept that verifying through the same compromised channel (e.g., replying to the email) is insufficient, and the trap here is that candidates may think replying to ask for confirmation is a safe step, when in fact it only engages with the attacker.
Trap categories for this question
Similar concept trap
Sharing the email widely may spread confusion and does not confirm whether it is legitimate.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Business email compromise attacks often rely on SMTP header manipulation, where the 'From' field displays a trusted name while the 'Reply-To' or 'Return-Path' points to an attacker-controlled domain. Modern email security solutions use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to authenticate sender domains, but these checks can fail if the attacker uses a lookalike domain (e.g., 'ceo@cornpany.com' instead of 'ceo@company.com') or if the organization's email security policies are misconfigured. In a real-world scenario, an employee who verifies via a separate channel might discover that the CEO is in a meeting and never sent the email, preventing a fraudulent transfer of thousands of dollars.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
An employee at a financial services firm receives an email that appears to come from the IT helpdesk, asking them to reset their password via a link. The link leads to a convincing fake portal that harvests credentials. Security teams use phishing simulations and security-awareness training to reduce this attack vector. Questions like this test whether you can identify social engineering techniques and appropriate controls.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
General Security Concepts — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
General Security Concepts practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SY0-701 questions
1,152 questions across all exam domains
- →
Security+ SY0-701 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SY0-701 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
General Security Concepts practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to General Security Concepts.
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations.
Security Architecture practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Architecture.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Operations.
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Program Management and Oversight.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free SY0-701 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
General Security Concepts — This question tests General Security Concepts — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Verify the request using a separate trusted method — Option C is correct because the email exhibits classic signs of a business email compromise (BEC) attack, where the sender address is spoofed or slightly altered. Verifying the request through a separate, trusted method—such as calling the CEO directly or using a known internal communication channel—bypasses any compromised email system and confirms the legitimacy of the request. This aligns with the principle of out-of-band verification, which is a key defense against phishing and social engineering.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "best", "first". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026
This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.