- A
Isolate the workstation from the network using EDR or NAC containment.
Isolating the host immediately stops most outbound command-and-control traffic and reduces the chance of lateral spread. It is the best first containment step when malware is still active. It preserves the system state better than power loss, which can destroy volatile evidence.
- B
Immediately wipe and reimage the workstation before collecting anything else.
Why wrong: Reimaging removes the malware, but it also destroys important evidence and loses visibility into how the compromise occurred. That is a recovery step after containment and acquisition, not the first action when the endpoint is still active.
- C
Capture volatile evidence such as memory contents, running processes, and active network connections.
Collecting volatile data while the machine is live preserves clues about injected code, memory-only malware, sockets, and active sessions. This supports later investigation and root-cause analysis. It is appropriate before shutdown when the organization wants to preserve evidence.
- D
Power the workstation off immediately to stop the malware process.
Why wrong: Powering off may stop execution, but it also destroys volatile evidence and can interfere with understanding the infection. It is sometimes justified for safety, but it is not the best first choice when the host is still available for live response.
- E
Disable every user account in the finance department to prevent further compromise.
Why wrong: A broad account shutdown would be disruptive and is not targeted to the likely infected host. Containment should start with the affected system and any confirmed compromised identities, rather than creating unnecessary business impact.
Quick Answer
The correct first actions are to isolate the workstation and capture volatile evidence. Isolating the workstation immediately cuts the HTTPS beacon traffic to the rare domain, severing the command-and-control communication and preventing lateral movement to other systems, while leaving the disk-based evidence intact for later analysis. Capturing volatile evidence—such as memory contents, running processes, and active network connections—is critical because this data disappears the moment the system is powered down or disconnected, and it holds the forensic keys to understanding the attack chain, including the rundll32 execution and scheduled task creation. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the incident response containment steps and the priority of preserving volatile data over non-volatile data; a common trap is to immediately shut down the workstation, which destroys the very evidence needed for root-cause analysis. Remember the mnemonic “ICED” for incident response containment: Isolate, Capture volatile Evidence, then Document.
SY0-701 Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations Practice Question
This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of threats, vulnerabilities, and mitigations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
An EDR alert shows a finance workstation launching rundll32 from %AppData%, creating a scheduled task, and making repeated HTTPS beacons to a rare domain. The user still has open accounting files, and the SOC wants to slow spread without losing evidence. What two actions should be taken first? Select two.
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"first"Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Isolate the workstation from the network using EDR or NAC containment.
Isolating the workstation (A) stops the malware from communicating with its C2 server via HTTPS beacons and prevents lateral movement, while preserving the evidence on disk. Capturing volatile evidence (C) before any shutdown or isolation ensures that memory-resident artifacts, active network connections, and running processes are preserved, which are critical for forensic analysis and understanding the attack chain.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Isolate the workstation from the network using EDR or NAC containment.
Why this is correct
Isolating the host immediately stops most outbound command-and-control traffic and reduces the chance of lateral spread. It is the best first containment step when malware is still active. It preserves the system state better than power loss, which can destroy volatile evidence.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Immediately wipe and reimage the workstation before collecting anything else.
Why it's wrong here
Reimaging removes the malware, but it also destroys important evidence and loses visibility into how the compromise occurred. That is a recovery step after containment and acquisition, not the first action when the endpoint is still active.
- ✓
Capture volatile evidence such as memory contents, running processes, and active network connections.
Why this is correct
Collecting volatile data while the machine is live preserves clues about injected code, memory-only malware, sockets, and active sessions. This supports later investigation and root-cause analysis. It is appropriate before shutdown when the organization wants to preserve evidence.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Power the workstation off immediately to stop the malware process.
Why it's wrong here
Powering off may stop execution, but it also destroys volatile evidence and can interfere with understanding the infection. It is sometimes justified for safety, but it is not the best first choice when the host is still available for live response.
- ✗
Disable every user account in the finance department to prevent further compromise.
Why it's wrong here
A broad account shutdown would be disruptive and is not targeted to the likely infected host. Containment should start with the affected system and any confirmed compromised identities, rather than creating unnecessary business impact.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates may choose to power off the workstation (D) thinking it stops the malware, but this destroys volatile evidence and can trigger anti-forensic mechanisms, whereas isolation and memory capture are the correct first steps in incident response.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Rundll32.exe is a legitimate Windows binary used to execute DLLs, but when launched from %AppData% it indicates DLL side-loading or living-off-the-land (LotL) abuse. The repeated HTTPS beacons to a rare domain suggest a C2 channel using encrypted traffic to evade network detection, often seen with malware like Cobalt Strike or BumbleBee. Capturing memory with tools like FTK Imager or WinPmem preserves the DLL payload and any injected code, while network isolation via EDR containment (e.g., blocking all traffic except to a forensic collector) stops the beacon without triggering anti-forensic routines.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A SOC analyst notices unusual lateral movement in the network at 2 AM. The IR playbook dictates: identify and contain (isolate the affected machine), then eradicate (remove the malware), then recover (restore from backup), then document. Skipping containment before eradication risks the attacker regaining access. Questions like this test the sequence and rationale of incident response phases.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SY0-701 questions
1,152 questions across all exam domains
- →
Security+ SY0-701 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SY0-701 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
General Security Concepts practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to General Security Concepts.
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations.
Security Architecture practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Architecture.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Operations.
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Program Management and Oversight.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free SY0-701 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — This question tests Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Isolate the workstation from the network using EDR or NAC containment. — Isolating the workstation (A) stops the malware from communicating with its C2 server via HTTPS beacons and prevents lateral movement, while preserving the evidence on disk. Capturing volatile evidence (C) before any shutdown or isolation ensures that memory-resident artifacts, active network connections, and running processes are preserved, which are critical for forensic analysis and understanding the attack chain.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more ways this is tested on SY0-701
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. EDR alerts show a finance laptop spawning an unsigned executable from %AppData%, attempting to read LSASS memory, and making outbound HTTPS connections to a rare domain. The user says they only opened a spreadsheet attachment. What is the best immediate action?
medium- A.Reboot the laptop to clear any malicious process from memory.
- ✓ B.Isolate the laptop from the network using the EDR platform.
- C.Run a full antivirus scan and wait for the results before taking further action.
- D.Reset the user's password and keep the laptop online for monitoring.
Why B: Option B is correct because the EDR alerts indicate a likely credential theft attempt (LSASS read) and C2 communication (rare domain). Isolating the laptop immediately stops data exfiltration and lateral movement, which is the priority before any remediation. Reboot, scan, or password reset would not prevent the attacker from already having access to credentials or the network.
Keep practising
More SY0-701 practice questions
- An HR analyst must send a salary file to an external auditor. The auditor only needs names, departments, and salary tota…
- An investigator receives a suspect laptop drive that may be used in court. Which approach best supports a forensically s…
- An investigator must collect data from a suspected insider-threat laptop so the evidence could be used in an HR and lega…
- An NDR tool shows a production web server sending small, periodic DNS queries to random-looking subdomains under a domai…
- An investigator needs to make a forensic image of a suspect laptop without changing the original drive contents. Which t…
- An operations team manages Linux servers over SSH. The security team wants to stop direct management access from employe…
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.