- A
Record the laptop's hostname and the user who last logged in.
Why wrong: Those details help with context, but they do not prove the image remained unchanged after acquisition.
- B
Compute and document cryptographic hashes of the source media and the forensic image.
Matching hashes provide strong integrity verification and are a standard way to show the acquired evidence has not changed.
- C
Copy the most recent files to a USB drive for quick review.
Why wrong: That creates an incomplete working copy and may alter metadata or miss important system artifacts entirely.
- D
Return the laptop to the user once the image is saved.
Why wrong: Returning the device too early risks contamination, tampering, and questions about evidence preservation.
SY0-701 Security Operations Practice Question
This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of security operations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
After seizing a suspected insider's laptop, a responder makes a bit-for-bit image of the drive. The legal team asks what step most directly proves the image was not altered after acquisition. What should be done?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Compute and document cryptographic hashes of the source media and the forensic image.
Option B is correct because computing and documenting cryptographic hashes (e.g., SHA-256 or MD5) of both the source media and the forensic image immediately after acquisition creates a verifiable digital fingerprint. If the hash values match, it proves that the image is an exact, unaltered copy of the original drive. This step is foundational to maintaining the chain of custody and ensuring data integrity in forensic investigations.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Record the laptop's hostname and the user who last logged in.
Why it's wrong here
Those details help with context, but they do not prove the image remained unchanged after acquisition.
- ✓
Compute and document cryptographic hashes of the source media and the forensic image.
Why this is correct
Matching hashes provide strong integrity verification and are a standard way to show the acquired evidence has not changed.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Copy the most recent files to a USB drive for quick review.
Why it's wrong here
That creates an incomplete working copy and may alter metadata or miss important system artifacts entirely.
- ✗
Return the laptop to the user once the image is saved.
Why it's wrong here
Returning the device too early risks contamination, tampering, and questions about evidence preservation.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates may confuse documentation steps (like recording hostnames) with integrity verification, or think that copying files to a USB drive is a valid forensic preservation method, when only cryptographic hashing provides mathematical proof of non-alteration.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Cryptographic hashing uses algorithms like SHA-256 to produce a fixed-size hash value from the entire bitstream of a drive; any single bit change in the image results in a completely different hash (avalanche effect). In practice, forensic tools such as FTK Imager or dd with hashing options compute the hash during acquisition and store it in a case report, allowing later verification even years later. A real-world scenario where this matters is when defense attorneys challenge evidence integrity, and the documented hash match is the only proof that the image was not tampered with.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A SOC analyst notices unusual lateral movement in the network at 2 AM. The IR playbook dictates: identify and contain (isolate the affected machine), then eradicate (remove the malware), then recover (restore from backup), then document. Skipping containment before eradication risks the attacker regaining access. Questions like this test the sequence and rationale of incident response phases.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Security Operations — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Security Operations practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SY0-701 questions
1,152 questions across all exam domains
- →
Security+ SY0-701 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SY0-701 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
General Security Concepts practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to General Security Concepts.
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations.
Security Architecture practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Architecture.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Operations.
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Program Management and Oversight.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free SY0-701 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Security Operations — This question tests Security Operations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Compute and document cryptographic hashes of the source media and the forensic image. — Option B is correct because computing and documenting cryptographic hashes (e.g., SHA-256 or MD5) of both the source media and the forensic image immediately after acquisition creates a verifiable digital fingerprint. If the hash values match, it proves that the image is an exact, unaltered copy of the original drive. This step is foundational to maintaining the chain of custody and ensuring data integrity in forensic investigations.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.