easymultiple choiceObjective-mapped

After a phishing incident, the security team wants to preserve evidence for later review. Which action is most appropriate?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

After a phishing incident, the security team wants to preserve evidence for later review. Which action is most appropriate?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Have the user delete the phishing email to avoid further exposure

Deleting the email removes evidence that could help determine the source and impact.

B

Best answer

Capture and save the email headers and message content

Headers and message content help investigators trace delivery paths and identify indicators of compromise.

C

Distractor review

Forward the email to every employee as a warning

Wide forwarding can spread the threat or confuse users without preserving forensic evidence.

D

Distractor review

Change the user's office seat assignment immediately

Relocating the user does not preserve evidence and does not address the incident itself.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Capture and save the email headers and message content — Preserving the email headers and message content is the most appropriate action because it keeps key forensic evidence intact. Headers can reveal sender infrastructure, reply paths, and message routing details, while the body of the email may contain malicious links, attachments, or social engineering clues. This evidence supports later analysis, user awareness, and blocking decisions. Good incident handling starts with preserving useful artifacts before they are altered or removed. Why others are wrong: Deleting the email destroys evidence needed for investigation. Forwarding the message broadly can increase risk and is not a preservation method. Changing a seat assignment has no security value in this situation and does nothing to help the response team understand the phishing attempt.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.