Question 333 of 1,152
General Security ConceptshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct answer is a digital signature created with the vendor's private key. While a hash provides integrity by detecting if a file has been altered, it cannot authenticate the source—anyone can compute a hash and claim it came from the vendor. A digital signature solves this by combining a hash with asymmetric encryption: the vendor signs the hash of the package with their private key, and you verify it with the vendor’s public key, proving both that the package is authentic and unmodified. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this question tests your understanding of the difference between integrity-only controls (like hashing) and mechanisms that also provide authentication. A common trap is choosing “hash integrity” alone, which fails if a mirror is compromised and the attacker replaces both the package and its hash. Remember the mnemonic: “Hash tells you if it’s changed; a signature tells you who changed it—and only the right key can prove it’s safe.”

SY0-701 General Security Concepts Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of general security concepts. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A vendor distributes a Linux package through multiple mirrors. Security wants to verify that the package really came from the vendor and was not altered after publication, even if a mirror or CDN is compromised. Which cryptographic mechanism should be checked?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

A digital signature created with the vendor's private key

A digital signature created with the vendor's private key provides both authentication (proving the package came from the vendor) and integrity (detecting any alteration after signing). Even if a mirror or CDN is compromised, the signature verification will fail if the package has been tampered with, because only the vendor's corresponding public key can validate the signature. This is the standard mechanism used by package managers like APT (with signed Release files) and RPM (with GPG signatures).

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • A hash value published on the mirror site alone

    Why it's wrong here

    A hash can detect tampering only if the hash itself is obtained from a trusted source. A compromised mirror could change both the file and the hash.

  • A digital signature created with the vendor's private key

    Why this is correct

    A digital signature provides authenticity and integrity. If the package was signed with the vendor's private key, anyone with the matching public certificate can verify that the package came from the vendor and has not been altered since signing. This works even if the download is mirrored or relayed by an untrusted CDN, because verification does not depend on trusting the transport path.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Symmetric encryption of the package with a shared secret

    Why it's wrong here

    Symmetric encryption protects confidentiality, but it does not by itself prove who created the package or whether it was modified.

  • Key stretching with a slow password algorithm

    Why it's wrong here

    Key stretching is used to make password guessing harder, not to verify software origin or file integrity.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse a simple hash (which provides integrity only if the hash source is trusted) with a digital signature (which provides both integrity and authentication even when the distribution channel is untrusted).

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Digital signatures use asymmetric cryptography: the vendor signs a hash of the package with their private key (e.g., using RSA or ECDSA with SHA-256). The recipient verifies the signature using the vendor's public key, which is typically distributed via a trusted key server or embedded in the package manager's keyring. In practice, tools like `gpg --verify` or `apt-key` are used, and the signature is often stored in a detached `.asc` file or inline within the package metadata.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A developer is choosing between AES-256 (symmetric) and RSA-2048 (asymmetric) for encrypting a large file that will be sent to a partner. Symmetric encryption is fast but requires key exchange; asymmetric is slower but solves the key distribution problem. A hybrid approach — encrypt the file with AES, encrypt the AES key with RSA — is standard. Questions like this test whether you understand when each approach applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

General Security Concepts — This question tests General Security Concepts — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: A digital signature created with the vendor's private key — A digital signature created with the vendor's private key provides both authentication (proving the package came from the vendor) and integrity (detecting any alteration after signing). Even if a mirror or CDN is compromised, the signature verification will fail if the package has been tampered with, because only the vendor's corresponding public key can validate the signature. This is the standard mechanism used by package managers like APT (with signed Release files) and RPM (with GPG signatures).

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on SY0-701

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A security team downloads a software update package signed by the vendor. The team verifies the signature using the vendor's public key before approving deployment. What does this verification primarily confirm?

medium
  • A.The package can only be decrypted by the vendor's private key
  • B.The package was likely created by the vendor and was not altered after signing
  • C.The package is encrypted with the vendor's public key
  • D.The vendor's certificate has not expired

Why B: Digital signature verification using the vendor's public key confirms that the package was signed with the vendor's private key, which only the vendor possesses. This provides authentication of the signer's identity and integrity of the data, ensuring the package has not been modified since signing. It does not provide confidentiality, as the package itself is not encrypted.

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.