Question 1,047 of 1,152
Security Program Management and OversighteasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SY0-701 Security Program Management and Oversight Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of security program management and oversight. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A small internal reporting server has a low-severity vulnerability. Fixing it now would require several hours of downtime, while the business impact of exploitation is considered low. What is the BEST risk treatment for this situation?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Accept the risk after documenting the decision

The best risk treatment is to accept the risk because the vulnerability is low-severity, the business impact of exploitation is low, and the cost of remediation (several hours of downtime) exceeds the potential loss. Documenting the acceptance ensures auditability and informed management approval, which is a standard practice in risk management frameworks like NIST SP 800-37.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Transfer the risk to a third party

    Why it's wrong here

    Insurance may help with financial loss, but it does not remove the underlying system risk.

  • Accept the risk after documenting the decision

    Why this is correct

    When both likelihood and impact are low, and remediation would create more disruption than benefit, accepting the risk can be the most practical choice. The key is to document the rationale, obtain the appropriate approval, and revisit the decision later if the system or threat landscape changes.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Avoid the risk by shutting down the server permanently

    Why it's wrong here

    Avoidance is appropriate only when the business can stop the risky activity altogether, which is not needed here.

  • Mitigate the risk by immediately replacing the server

    Why it's wrong here

    Mitigation may reduce exposure, but this option is unnecessarily costly for a low-risk internal system.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may confuse 'accepting risk' with ignoring it, or they may overestimate the need to transfer or avoid risk, failing to recognize that documented acceptance is a valid and often optimal treatment for low-impact, high-remediation-cost scenarios.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Risk acceptance is formally documented in a risk register, often with a residual risk statement signed by the risk owner. In practice, this decision might be revisited during periodic risk reviews or when the server’s exposure changes, such as if it becomes internet-facing. The cost-benefit analysis here compares the downtime cost (e.g., lost productivity, missed reports) against the likelihood and impact of exploitation, which for a low-severity vulnerability (e.g., CVSS score 3.0–4.9) typically involves minimal data exposure or no privilege escalation.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security team runs a vulnerability scan on a web application and discovers an unpatched SQL injection flaw. The team prioritises remediation by CVSS score — critical flaws are patched within 24 hours, high within 7 days. Questions like this test whether you understand vulnerability management processes, scanning tools, and remediation prioritisation.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Security Program Management and Oversight — This question tests Security Program Management and Oversight — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Accept the risk after documenting the decision — The best risk treatment is to accept the risk because the vulnerability is low-severity, the business impact of exploitation is low, and the cost of remediation (several hours of downtime) exceeds the potential loss. Documenting the acceptance ensures auditability and informed management approval, which is a standard practice in risk management frameworks like NIST SP 800-37.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SY0-701 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.