mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A SIEM correlates VPN logs and sees the same public IP make one failed login attempt against 56 different user accounts over 25 minutes. The usernames vary, but the password value appears to be the same in each attempt. Ten minutes later, one of those accounts authenticates successfully from the same IP, and no password-reset events are recorded. Which attack pattern is most likely?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A SIEM correlates VPN logs and sees the same public IP make one failed login attempt against 56 different user accounts over 25 minutes. The usernames vary, but the password value appears to be the same in each attempt. Ten minutes later, one of those accounts authenticates successfully from the same IP, and no password-reset events are recorded. Which attack pattern is most likely?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Password spraying against multiple accounts with a shared password guess.

This pattern matches password spraying because the attacker tries one common password across many usernames to avoid lockouts and reduce noisy failures. The same source IP, low failure count per account, and eventual success on one account are classic clues. Analysts should treat the successful login as potentially compromised and review related authentication, MFA, and session activity immediately.

B

Distractor review

A brute-force attack focused on a single account with repeated rapid guesses.

Brute force usually concentrates on one username and produces many failures for that same account rather than spreading attempts across many users.

C

Distractor review

A replay attack using captured authentication traffic from a previous session.

Replay attacks reuse intercepted credentials or tokens, which typically would not appear as many fresh failed password attempts across different accounts.

D

Distractor review

Credential stuffing using known breached username and password pairs.

Credential stuffing usually uses previously leaked valid pairs, while this scenario shows one repeated password being tested across many usernames.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Password spraying against multiple accounts with a shared password guess. — The pattern points to password spraying. Attackers intentionally keep the number of attempts per account low so they do not trigger lockouts or obvious brute-force alerts. The same password used across many usernames, followed by one successful login from the same source, is a strong indicator that the attacker is testing a common guess at scale. The account that succeeded should be treated as potentially compromised and investigated for MFA, token, and mailbox or VPN abuse. Why others are wrong: A brute-force attack would usually hammer one account with many guesses, not spread across dozens of users. Replay attacks reuse captured authentication material rather than generating a trail of password failures. Credential stuffing relies on leaked username/password combinations; this case instead suggests one shared password guess being sprayed across many accounts.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.