hardmulti selectObjective-mapped

A SIEM analyst reviews the following sequence from a VPN and email platform over 15 minutes: 47 failed logins against different accounts from one public IP, one successful VPN login from that same IP, a new inbox forwarding rule to an external address, and a mailbox sign-in from a device never seen before. Which three findings most strongly support a password-spraying-to-compromise scenario? Select three.

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

A SIEM analyst reviews the following sequence from a VPN and email platform over 15 minutes: 47 failed logins against different accounts from one public IP, one successful VPN login from that same IP, a new inbox forwarding rule to an external address, and a mailbox sign-in from a device never seen before. Which three findings most strongly support a password-spraying-to-compromise scenario? Select three.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Many failed logins across different usernames from the same source IP in a short time window.

That pattern strongly matches password spraying because one attacker tries a small number of guesses across many accounts.

B

Best answer

A successful VPN login from the same source IP after the burst of failures.

A success immediately after many failures suggests one of the sprayed credentials worked and the attacker gained access.

C

Best answer

An inbox forwarding rule sending messages to an external address.

External forwarding is a common persistence and exfiltration technique after account compromise.

D

Distractor review

A workstation patch installation completed earlier that day.

Routine patching is not evidence of compromise and does not correlate with the suspicious authentication pattern.

E

Distractor review

The mailbox server reported normal disk utilization during the same hour.

Normal server health metrics do not explain or confirm the suspicious login and forwarding activity.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Many failed logins across different usernames from the same source IP in a short time window. — The combination of many failures across many accounts, a later success from the same IP, and an external forwarding rule is a strong indicator of password spraying followed by account takeover and persistence. The first event shows the attack method, the second shows probable compromise, and the third shows an action commonly used to maintain access or steal mail. Together, they justify escalation and immediate account containment. Why others are wrong: A patch completion event is unrelated to the login pattern and is often just routine maintenance. Normal disk utilization on the mail server does not meaningfully support or refute the compromise. Those are background signals, not indicators that tie the attack sequence together.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.