A SIEM alert shows five failed logins to a SaaS admin portal from one IP, followed by a successful login from a new city three minutes later. Which two actions are the best next steps for the analyst to validate the event before containment? Select two.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.
Best answer
Review the identity provider and MFA logs to confirm the successful login came from the same account and device context.
This is the best first validation step because identity provider logs can confirm whether the login sequence used the expected MFA method, device, and authentication path. It helps distinguish suspicious access from legitimate use, such as a new browser session or a reauthentication event. Correlating the alert with authoritative identity logs also reduces reliance on a single SIEM record and improves triage accuracy.
Best answer
Correlate the source IP with corporate VPN, CASB, or known cloud egress ranges.
This is also a strong validation step because a new city in an alert is not automatically malicious if the traffic originated from a trusted remote-access service or sanctioned cloud egress. Matching the IP to known organizational ranges, VPN concentrators, or security proxy infrastructure can quickly explain the anomaly. That context is essential before escalating to disruptive containment actions.
Distractor review
Immediately disable the SaaS platform for every user until the investigation is finished.
This is overly disruptive for an initial validation step and would create unnecessary business impact. The alert concerns one account, so broad shutdown is not proportional. Containment may be needed later if compromise is confirmed, but the analyst should first verify the source, device, and authentication context.
Distractor review
Reimage the user’s laptop immediately to remove any possible malware.
Reimaging is a remediation action, not a first validation step for a suspicious cloud login. The event may have originated from credential theft, a trusted VPN, or a temporary travel pattern rather than local malware. Destroying the endpoint state too early can also eliminate evidence that would help determine the true source of access.
Distractor review
Delete the failed login records to reduce noise in the SIEM.
Deleting logs would damage investigation quality and could violate retention requirements. Failed attempts are often valuable evidence of password spraying or credential stuffing. The correct approach is to preserve and correlate those logs, not remove them.
Common exam trap
Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic
NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.
Technical deep dive
How to think about this question
NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
- PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
- Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
- NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.
TExam Day Tips
- Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
- Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
- Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Security+ security operations questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ security operations questions.
Security+ zero trust questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ zero trust questions.
Security+ authentication factors questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ authentication factors questions.
More questions from this exam
Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.
Question 1
A laptop is suspected of being used in a malware incident. It is still powered on and connected to Wi-Fi. What should the responder do before shutting it down?
Question 2
An employee reports a ransomware note on a file server. The server is still powered on, shares are still being accessed, and management wants service restored as quickly as possible. What should the incident response team do first?
Question 3
An employee reports a ransomware note on a finance laptop. The laptop is still powered on, connected to Wi-Fi, and the user says they were just working in a spreadsheet. Management wants the fastest safe response that also preserves evidence. What should the responder do first?
Question 4
You are handed a company laptop suspected in an insider theft case. Legal says the evidence may be needed in court. Which action best preserves admissibility?
Question 5
A developer wants to reduce the risk of SQL injection in a new customer search form. Which two changes are the best mitigations? Select two.
Question 6
A branch office uses a flat LAN, and a compromise on one user workstation could spread quickly to finance systems. Management wants finance workstations isolated from general users, but finance staff still need access to a central finance application and network printer. What is the best design change?
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Review the identity provider and MFA logs to confirm the successful login came from the same account and device context. — The best answers are to review the identity provider and MFA logs and to correlate the source IP with trusted organizational egress such as VPN or CASB infrastructure. Together, those steps validate whether the account activity reflects a real compromise or a legitimate access pattern that simply looks unusual in the SIEM. They preserve evidence while the analyst confirms context before moving to containment. Why others are wrong: Broadly disabling the platform or reimaging the laptop is too aggressive before basic validation. Those actions can disrupt operations and destroy evidence. Deleting log records is never appropriate because they are critical for tracing authentication attempts, identifying source patterns, and documenting the incident accurately.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.