A SIEM alert shows a workstation making repeated outbound HTTPS connections every 15 minutes to the same cloud IP address. The host belongs to the patch-management group, and the security team suspects an approved agent may be responsible. Which two checks best validate whether this is a false positive? Select two.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.
Best answer
Verify that the destination domain and IP match the vendor's documented update service.
Correct because matching the observed destination to an approved vendor endpoint strongly supports legitimate automated behavior. It helps confirm that the traffic pattern aligns with expected patch-agent communications.
Best answer
Compare the running process, parent process, and digital signature to the approved agent baseline.
Correct because a trusted process with a valid signature and expected parent process is much more likely to be the sanctioned update tool. This is a strong way to separate normal maintenance activity from malware.
Distractor review
Immediately isolate the workstation from the network without reviewing any other evidence.
Incorrect because isolation may be unnecessary if the alert is a known maintenance pattern. In monitoring and validation work, confirmatory evidence should be checked before disruptive containment.
Distractor review
Suppress every future alert from that subnet permanently.
Incorrect because permanent suppression can hide real malicious activity later. A false positive should be tuned carefully, not ignored forever without verification.
Distractor review
Assume the traffic is benign because it occurs at a regular interval.
Incorrect because regular intervals can also describe malware beaconing. Timing alone is not enough to prove legitimacy.
Common exam trap
Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses
Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.
Technical deep dive
How to think about this question
Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
- Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
- Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
- The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.
TExam Day Tips
- Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
- Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
- Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Security+ security operations questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ security operations questions.
Security+ zero trust questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ zero trust questions.
Security+ authentication factors questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ authentication factors questions.
More questions from this exam
Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.
Question 1
A laptop is suspected of being used in a malware incident. It is still powered on and connected to Wi-Fi. What should the responder do before shutting it down?
Question 2
An employee reports a ransomware note on a file server. The server is still powered on, shares are still being accessed, and management wants service restored as quickly as possible. What should the incident response team do first?
Question 3
An employee reports a ransomware note on a finance laptop. The laptop is still powered on, connected to Wi-Fi, and the user says they were just working in a spreadsheet. Management wants the fastest safe response that also preserves evidence. What should the responder do first?
Question 4
You are handed a company laptop suspected in an insider theft case. Legal says the evidence may be needed in court. Which action best preserves admissibility?
Question 5
A developer wants to reduce the risk of SQL injection in a new customer search form. Which two changes are the best mitigations? Select two.
Question 6
A branch office uses a flat LAN, and a compromise on one user workstation could spread quickly to finance systems. Management wants finance workstations isolated from general users, but finance staff still need access to a central finance application and network printer. What is the best design change?
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Verify that the destination domain and IP match the vendor's documented update service. — To validate a false positive, the analyst should match the destination to the approved vendor service and verify the process signature and lineage against the known agent baseline. Those checks confirm whether the communication pattern and executable identity are consistent with normal patching behavior. In monitoring work, correlating multiple sources is better than relying on timing alone, because malicious beacons can also appear periodic. Why others are wrong: Immediate isolation is premature if the traffic matches an authorized update tool. Permanent suppression is unsafe because it can hide future incidents. Regular timing does not prove legitimacy, since many malware families beacon on fixed schedules. The better approach is to correlate endpoint, signature, and destination evidence before deciding.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.