- A
Identity provider and MFA authentication logs for the account session
These logs show whether the sign-in was legitimate, challenged, or bypassed by a compromised session.
- B
Cloud application audit logs for mailbox and rule changes
Audit logs confirm which administrative actions were performed, by whom, and from what session context.
- C
Printer spooler logs from the user’s workstation
Why wrong: Printer logs rarely help validate cloud account abuse or mailbox forwarding changes in this scenario.
- D
DHCP lease logs for the office network
Why wrong: DHCP logs may show local address assignment, but they do not confirm cloud portal abuse or rule changes.
- E
USB device connection logs from the user’s laptop
Why wrong: USB history could matter in some incidents, but it is not the first evidence source for this cloud account event.
Quick Answer
The correct answer is the cloud application audit logs and the identity provider (IdP) logs, because the audit logs capture the exact mailbox forwarding-rule changes, while the IdP logs verify the authentication method and MFA status of the unusual country sign-in. When a SIEM alert triggers for an unusual country login followed by a mailbox forwarding rule change, the analyst must first confirm whether the session was legitimate or a result of account takeover. The cloud application audit logs provide the granular details of the forwarding rule creation, and the IdP logs reveal if MFA was bypassed or a token was reused, which is the core technical concept tested here. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this scenario tests your ability to prioritize log sources during incident response, and a common trap is to jump to network logs or firewall logs first, which won’t show the authentication or rule-change trail. Remember the mnemonic “AIM” — Audit logs for the change, IdP for the authentication, and MFA logs for the session’s validity.
SY0-701 Security Operations Practice Question
This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of security operations. Examine the command output carefully: the correct answer depends on what the output actually shows, not on general recall alone. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A SIEM alert shows a successful sign-in to a cloud admin portal from an unusual country, followed by mailbox forwarding-rule changes four minutes later. Which two log sources should the analyst review first to confirm whether the account was abused? Select two.
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"first"Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Identity provider and MFA authentication logs for the account session
Option A is correct because the identity provider (IdP) logs will show the authentication method used (e.g., SAML, OIDC) and the MFA logs will confirm whether a valid second factor was presented. If the sign-in succeeded without MFA or with a compromised token, it indicates account takeover. These logs are the first place to verify the legitimacy of the session.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Identity provider and MFA authentication logs for the account session
Why this is correct
These logs show whether the sign-in was legitimate, challenged, or bypassed by a compromised session.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✓
Cloud application audit logs for mailbox and rule changes
Why this is correct
Audit logs confirm which administrative actions were performed, by whom, and from what session context.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Printer spooler logs from the user’s workstation
Why it's wrong here
Printer logs rarely help validate cloud account abuse or mailbox forwarding changes in this scenario.
- ✗
DHCP lease logs for the office network
Why it's wrong here
DHCP logs may show local address assignment, but they do not confirm cloud portal abuse or rule changes.
- ✗
USB device connection logs from the user’s laptop
Why it's wrong here
USB history could matter in some incidents, but it is not the first evidence source for this cloud account event.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates may focus on network-level logs (DHCP, printer) because they associate 'unusual country' with network location, but the question specifically requires logs that directly capture authentication events and mailbox rule changes in the cloud.
Trap categories for this question
Command / output trap
DHCP logs may show local address assignment, but they do not confirm cloud portal abuse or rule changes.
Scenario analysis trap
Printer logs rarely help validate cloud account abuse or mailbox forwarding changes in this scenario.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Identity provider logs capture the authentication context, including IP address, user agent, and authentication method (e.g., password, FIDO2, TOTP). MFA logs record whether the second factor was successfully validated and which method was used (e.g., push notification, SMS, hardware token). In a real-world scenario, an attacker might bypass MFA using a session cookie replay or a compromised OAuth token, which would appear in these logs as a successful authentication without a fresh MFA challenge.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Security Operations — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Security Operations practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SY0-701 questions
1,152 questions across all exam domains
- →
Security+ SY0-701 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SY0-701 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
General Security Concepts practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to General Security Concepts.
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations.
Security Architecture practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Architecture.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Operations.
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Program Management and Oversight.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free SY0-701 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Security Operations — This question tests Security Operations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Identity provider and MFA authentication logs for the account session — Option A is correct because the identity provider (IdP) logs will show the authentication method used (e.g., SAML, OIDC) and the MFA logs will confirm whether a valid second factor was presented. If the sign-in succeeded without MFA or with a compromised token, it indicates account takeover. These logs are the first place to verify the legitimacy of the session.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
3 more ways this is tested on SY0-701
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. A SIEM alert shows five failed logins to a SaaS admin portal from one IP, followed by a successful login from a new city three minutes later. Which two actions are the best next steps for the analyst to validate the event before containment? Select two.
medium- ✓ A.Review the identity provider and MFA logs to confirm the successful login came from the same account and device context.
- ✓ B.Correlate the source IP with corporate VPN, CASB, or known cloud egress ranges.
- C.Immediately disable the SaaS platform for every user until the investigation is finished.
- D.Reimage the user’s laptop immediately to remove any possible malware.
- E.Delete the failed login records to reduce noise in the SIEM.
Why A: Option A is correct because reviewing the identity provider (IdP) and MFA logs allows the analyst to verify whether the successful login originated from the same user account and device context as the failed attempts. This step is critical to determine if the successful login was an attacker who bypassed MFA or a legitimate user who eventually succeeded, providing evidence of account compromise or a false positive.
Variation 2. After a new MFA policy rollout, the SIEM generates an alert for five failed logins to a SaaS admin portal from one IP, followed by a successful login to the same account from an IP in another country. The account owner says they were in meetings all day. What should the analyst do first?
medium- A.Disable the account immediately without checking any other logs.
- ✓ B.Correlate identity provider, VPN, and endpoint logs to validate whether the activity matches the user's normal pattern.
- C.Delete the alert because MFA was enabled and the login eventually succeeded.
- D.Reimage the user's laptop to remove any possible malware right away.
Why B: Option B is correct because the alert shows a successful login after five failures from a different country, which is a classic indicator of a potential account takeover. The analyst must correlate identity provider logs (e.g., Okta, Azure AD) for authentication details, VPN logs for network origination, and endpoint logs for device posture to determine if the successful login matches the user's normal behavior. This step validates whether the activity is legitimate or malicious before taking any irreversible action.
Variation 3. A SIEM reports a successful sign-in to a SaaS admin portal from a new country, followed three minutes later by multiple configuration changes to mailbox forwarding rules. The account owner says they were in the office and did not approve any changes. What should the analyst check next?
medium- ✓ A.The identity provider and MFA logs to confirm whether the session was legitimately authenticated or hijacked.
- B.The office printer logs to see whether the user printed the mailbox rules.
- C.The antivirus signature version on the user’s laptop only.
- D.The DNS cache on the user’s laptop to find the forwarding rule target.
Why A: Option A is correct because the SIEM alert shows a successful sign-in from a new country followed by suspicious configuration changes, which is a classic indicator of session hijacking or credential theft. Checking the identity provider (IdP) and MFA logs allows the analyst to verify if the authentication was legitimate (e.g., from a known device/IP) or if the session token was stolen and reused, as MFA can be bypassed via token replay or consent phishing. This step directly addresses the core question of whether the session was authorized or compromised.
Keep practising
More SY0-701 practice questions
- An HR analyst must send a salary file to an external auditor. The auditor only needs names, departments, and salary tota…
- An investigator receives a suspect laptop drive that may be used in court. Which approach best supports a forensically s…
- An investigator must collect data from a suspected insider-threat laptop so the evidence could be used in an HR and lega…
- An NDR tool shows a production web server sending small, periodic DNS queries to random-looking subdomains under a domai…
- An investigator needs to make a forensic image of a suspect laptop without changing the original drive contents. Which t…
- An operations team manages Linux servers over SSH. The security team wants to stop direct management access from employe…
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.