- A
Deny the exception and require the project to use an approved platform that meets the AES-256 requirement.
Why wrong: This is incorrect because if the risk is within the organization's risk appetite and compensating controls are effective, a blanket denial may be overly restrictive and could hinder legitimate business operations. Policy exceptions exist to allow flexibility when risk is acceptable.
- B
Approve the exception and document the compensating controls and a review date.
This is correct because a formal exception process with documented compensating controls and a scheduled review ensures that the risk is managed, tracked, and reassessed over time. This aligns with security program management best practices.
- C
Accept the risk and allow the project to proceed without a formal exception.
Why wrong: This is incorrect because bypassing the formal exception process undermines governance and auditability. Even if risk is accepted, it should be documented through the exception process to maintain accountability and support future reviews.
- D
Escalate the request to the chief information officer for a final decision.
Why wrong: This is incorrect because the security manager typically has the authority to approve policy exceptions within the defined risk appetite. Escalation without a clear reason adds unnecessary delay and does not leverage the manager's risk assessment.
SY0-701 Security Program Management and Oversight Practice Question
This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of security program management and oversight. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A security manager at a healthcare organization is responsible for maintaining the information security policy. A project manager requests a policy exception to use a cloud-based analytics platform that stores patient data. The platform currently encrypts data at rest with AES-128 instead of the required AES-256. The security manager assesses the risk and determines that the likelihood of data exposure is low due to other compensating controls already in place, but the impact would be high. The residual risk is within the organization's risk appetite. Which of the following is the most appropriate action for the security manager to take?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Approve the exception and document the compensating controls and a review date.
Option B is correct because the security manager has assessed the risk, determined that compensating controls reduce the likelihood of data exposure, and confirmed that the residual risk is within the organization's risk appetite. Formally approving the exception with documented compensating controls and a review date ensures governance, accountability, and a timeline for reassessment, which aligns with the policy exception process in security program management.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Deny the exception and require the project to use an approved platform that meets the AES-256 requirement.
Why it's wrong here
This is incorrect because if the risk is within the organization's risk appetite and compensating controls are effective, a blanket denial may be overly restrictive and could hinder legitimate business operations. Policy exceptions exist to allow flexibility when risk is acceptable.
- ✓
Approve the exception and document the compensating controls and a review date.
Why this is correct
This is correct because a formal exception process with documented compensating controls and a scheduled review ensures that the risk is managed, tracked, and reassessed over time. This aligns with security program management best practices.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Accept the risk and allow the project to proceed without a formal exception.
Why it's wrong here
This is incorrect because bypassing the formal exception process undermines governance and auditability. Even if risk is accepted, it should be documented through the exception process to maintain accountability and support future reviews.
- ✗
Escalate the request to the chief information officer for a final decision.
Why it's wrong here
This is incorrect because the security manager typically has the authority to approve policy exceptions within the defined risk appetite. Escalation without a clear reason adds unnecessary delay and does not leverage the manager's risk assessment.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates may assume any deviation from policy must be denied (Option A) or escalated (Option D), failing to recognize that a formal exception process with compensating controls and a review date is the correct risk-based action when residual risk is within appetite.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
AES-128 and AES-256 differ in key length (128 vs 256 bits), but both are considered secure for data at rest; the compensating controls (e.g., network segmentation, access controls, encryption in transit) reduce the likelihood of exposure. In healthcare, HIPAA requires encryption as an addressable implementation specification, so documenting the exception with a review date ensures compliance by tracking when the platform must be upgraded or re-evaluated. Real-world scenarios often involve balancing security requirements with operational needs, where a formal exception process with compensating controls is preferred over outright denial or undocumented acceptance.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A developer is choosing between AES-256 (symmetric) and RSA-2048 (asymmetric) for encrypting a large file that will be sent to a partner. Symmetric encryption is fast but requires key exchange; asymmetric is slower but solves the key distribution problem. A hybrid approach — encrypt the file with AES, encrypt the AES key with RSA — is standard. Questions like this test whether you understand when each approach applies.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Security Program Management and Oversight — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SY0-701 questions
1,152 questions across all exam domains
- →
Security+ SY0-701 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SY0-701 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
General Security Concepts practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to General Security Concepts.
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations.
Security Architecture practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Architecture.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Operations.
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Program Management and Oversight.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free SY0-701 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Security Program Management and Oversight — This question tests Security Program Management and Oversight — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Approve the exception and document the compensating controls and a review date. — Option B is correct because the security manager has assessed the risk, determined that compensating controls reduce the likelihood of data exposure, and confirmed that the residual risk is within the organization's risk appetite. Formally approving the exception with documented compensating controls and a review date ensures governance, accountability, and a timeline for reassessment, which aligns with the policy exception process in security program management.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More SY0-701 practice questions
- An HR analyst must send a salary file to an external auditor. The auditor only needs names, departments, and salary tota…
- An investigator receives a suspect laptop drive that may be used in court. Which approach best supports a forensically s…
- An investigator must collect data from a suspected insider-threat laptop so the evidence could be used in an HR and lega…
- An NDR tool shows a production web server sending small, periodic DNS queries to random-looking subdomains under a domai…
- An investigator needs to make a forensic image of a suspect laptop without changing the original drive contents. Which t…
- An operations team manages Linux servers over SSH. The security team wants to stop direct management access from employe…
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.