- A
Disable the user account immediately and reset the password.
Why wrong: Disabling the account immediately may be too aggressive without confirming the login was malicious. It could disrupt legitimate user activity if the alert is a false positive (e.g., the user is traveling). Proper incident response requires analysis before containment.
- B
Conduct a full forensic analysis of the user's workstation.
Why wrong: A full forensic analysis is not the immediate next step for a single anomalous login alert. Such an in-depth investigation is reserved for confirmed compromises or incidents with significant impact. It would be premature and resource-intensive at this point.
- C
Review the account's recent activity for signs of compromise.
Reviewing recent activity (e.g., successful logins, file access, privilege escalation attempts) is the appropriate analysis step to validate the alert. This helps determine if the account is compromised and guides subsequent containment and eradication actions.
- D
Report the incident to law enforcement.
Why wrong: Law enforcement reporting is typically reserved for incidents that involve criminal activity, data breaches, or legal obligations. This single alert does not yet warrant such a report; the incident must first be investigated and confirmed.
Quick Answer
The correct next step is to review the account’s recent activity for signs of compromise. This aligns with the Detection & Analysis phase of the NIST incident response framework, where the priority after receiving an alert is to validate the event and determine its scope before taking action. By examining recent logins, accessed files, and system changes, the analyst can confirm whether the unusual login geographic location and 3:00 AM time indicate a true breach or a false positive, such as a traveling user. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this question tests your understanding of the incident response process and the common trap of jumping to containment or eradication without first performing analysis. Remember the memory tip: “Analyze before you paralyze”—never disable an account or escalate until you have context from the account’s recent activity.
SY0-701 Security Operations Practice Question
This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of security operations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A security analyst receives an automated alert indicating that a standard user account logged in from a geographic location that is unusual for the user, and the login occurred at 3:00 AM local time. The analyst has not yet verified whether this was a successful login or if any additional suspicious activity occurred. According to standard incident response procedures, what should the analyst do NEXT?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Review the account's recent activity for signs of compromise.
The correct next step is to review the account's recent activity to gather more context. According to the NIST incident response process (Preparation, Detection & Analysis, Containment, Eradication & Recovery, Post-Incident Activity), after detection the analyst should perform analysis to validate the alert and determine the scope. Reviewing recent logins, accessed files, and other actions helps decide if containment is needed. Immediately disabling the account (A) could be premature if the alert is a false positive or if the user is traveling. Conducting a full forensic analysis (B) is too resource-intensive for a single alert without further evidence. Reporting to law enforcement (D) is not appropriate at this stage; that would occur after a confirmed incident that meets legal thresholds.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Disable the user account immediately and reset the password.
Why it's wrong here
Disabling the account immediately may be too aggressive without confirming the login was malicious. It could disrupt legitimate user activity if the alert is a false positive (e.g., the user is traveling). Proper incident response requires analysis before containment.
- ✗
Conduct a full forensic analysis of the user's workstation.
Why it's wrong here
A full forensic analysis is not the immediate next step for a single anomalous login alert. Such an in-depth investigation is reserved for confirmed compromises or incidents with significant impact. It would be premature and resource-intensive at this point.
- ✓
Review the account's recent activity for signs of compromise.
Why this is correct
Reviewing recent activity (e.g., successful logins, file access, privilege escalation attempts) is the appropriate analysis step to validate the alert. This helps determine if the account is compromised and guides subsequent containment and eradication actions.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Report the incident to law enforcement.
Why it's wrong here
Law enforcement reporting is typically reserved for incidents that involve criminal activity, data breaches, or legal obligations. This single alert does not yet warrant such a report; the incident must first be investigated and confirmed.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
- Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
- Underline the problem statement mentally.
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A SOC analyst notices unusual lateral movement in the network at 2 AM. The IR playbook dictates: identify and contain (isolate the affected machine), then eradicate (remove the malware), then recover (restore from backup), then document. Skipping containment before eradication risks the attacker regaining access. Questions like this test the sequence and rationale of incident response phases.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which SY0-701 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
- →
Security Operations — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Security Operations practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SY0-701 questions
1,152 questions across all exam domains
- →
Security+ SY0-701 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SY0-701 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
General Security Concepts practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to General Security Concepts.
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations.
Security Architecture practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Architecture.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Operations.
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Program Management and Oversight.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free SY0-701 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Security Operations — This question tests Security Operations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Review the account's recent activity for signs of compromise. — The correct next step is to review the account's recent activity to gather more context. According to the NIST incident response process (Preparation, Detection & Analysis, Containment, Eradication & Recovery, Post-Incident Activity), after detection the analyst should perform analysis to validate the alert and determine the scope. Reviewing recent logins, accessed files, and other actions helps decide if containment is needed. Immediately disabling the account (A) could be premature if the alert is a false positive or if the user is traveling. Conducting a full forensic analysis (B) is too resource-intensive for a single alert without further evidence. Reporting to law enforcement (D) is not appropriate at this stage; that would occur after a confirmed incident that meets legal thresholds.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Identify which SY0-701 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: May 17, 2026
This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.