mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A security analyst is reviewing the source code of a custom network service written in C. The service allocates a 256-byte buffer and uses the strcpy() function to copy incoming data into that buffer without verifying the length of the input. If an attacker sends a specially crafted payload that exceeds 256 bytes, which security control would be most effective at detecting and preventing the resulting exploitation at runtime?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A security analyst is reviewing the source code of a custom network service written in C. The service allocates a 256-byte buffer and uses the strcpy() function to copy incoming data into that buffer without verifying the length of the input. If an attacker sends a specially crafted payload that exceeds 256 bytes, which security control would be most effective at detecting and preventing the resulting exploitation at runtime?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Stack canaries

Correct. Stack canaries are placed before the return address on the stack. If a buffer overflow overwrites the canary, the program terminates, preventing control-flow hijacking. This is a highly effective runtime defense against stack-based buffer overflows.

B

Distractor review

Transport Layer Security (TLS)

Incorrect. TLS encrypts network traffic but does not protect against vulnerabilities in the application code itself, such as buffer overflows. It cannot prevent the exploitation of memory corruption bugs.

C

Distractor review

Code signing

Incorrect. Code signing verifies that the software has not been tampered with and identifies the publisher. It does not provide runtime protection against memory corruption exploits in the running application.

D

Distractor review

Data Execution Prevention (DEP)

Incorrect. DEP makes memory regions non-executable, which can prevent direct execution of injected shellcode. However, sophisticated attackers can bypass DEP using return-oriented programming (ROP). Stack canaries are generally more effective for detecting the overflow itself, even when DEP is present.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Stack canaries — The vulnerability is a classic buffer overflow that can overwrite the return address on the stack. Stack canaries are small values placed before the return address; if a buffer overflow occurs, the canary is corrupted, and the program terminates before control can be hijacked. This makes stack canaries the most direct runtime mitigation for stack-based buffer overflows. Transport Layer Security (TLS) encrypts data in transit but does not prevent buffer overflows in the application. Code signing ensures the integrity and authenticity of the binary but does not stop exploitation once the code runs. Data Execution Prevention (DEP) prevents execution of code in non-executable memory regions; however, attackers can bypass DEP using return-oriented programming (ROP), while a stack canary would still detect the overflow and abort.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.