Question 564 of 1,152
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and MitigationsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The internet-facing VPN appliance should be remediated first because it combines high exposure with high exploitability. This vulnerability is remotely exploitable from the public internet, and the existence of public proof-of-concept code dramatically increases the likelihood of an attack, whereas the isolated lab workstation’s local privilege escalation requires prior access and presents a far smaller attack surface. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of vulnerability prioritization frameworks that weigh both exposure and exploitability over raw severity scores alone. A common trap is to focus solely on the CVSS critical rating without considering the context of the asset’s network placement or the availability of exploit code. Remember the memory tip: “Internet-facing with exploit code beats isolated with high score” — always prioritize what can be reached and broken into first.

SY0-701 Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of threats, vulnerabilities, and mitigations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A scan reports a critical remote code execution vulnerability on an internet-facing VPN appliance with public proof-of-concept exploit code available. It also reports a critical local privilege escalation on an isolated lab workstation. Patch windows are limited this week. Which should be remediated first?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "first"

    Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Read the full VPN explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The internet-facing VPN appliance because it has higher exposure and exploitability.

The internet-facing VPN appliance presents a higher risk because it is exposed to the public internet and has a known remote code execution vulnerability with public exploit code. This combination of high exposure (attack surface) and high exploitability (availability of proof-of-concept code) significantly increases the likelihood of a successful attack, making it the priority for remediation despite limited patch windows.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The internet-facing VPN appliance because it has higher exposure and exploitability.

    Why this is correct

    An externally reachable device with a known exploit and remote code execution risk presents a much larger immediate threat than an isolated lab workstation. Prioritization should consider exposure, exploit maturity, and business impact, not severity score alone. Because the VPN appliance is publicly reachable, compromise could lead directly to remote access into the environment and broader organizational impact.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The isolated lab workstation because all critical findings must be patched in numerical order.

    Why it's wrong here

    Patch ordering should be risk-based, not based on scan severity alone or scan listing order.

  • The internal printer because peripheral devices are often overlooked and therefore most dangerous.

    Why it's wrong here

    Printers can matter, but this option does not address the highest-risk finding or the exposure described in the scenario.

  • The lab workstation because local privilege escalation is always more dangerous than remote code execution.

    Why it's wrong here

    Local privilege escalation is serious, but it usually requires prior access and has less immediate reach than an internet-facing RCE.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may assume all critical vulnerabilities are equal and must be patched in order of severity score, ignoring the critical factor of asset exposure and the presence of public exploit code, which dramatically increases the real-world risk.

Trap categories for this question

  • Scenario analysis trap

    Printers can matter, but this option does not address the highest-risk finding or the exposure described in the scenario.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Remote code execution (RCE) on an internet-facing VPN appliance typically involves vulnerabilities in protocols like SSL/TLS or IPSec, where an unauthenticated attacker can send crafted packets to execute arbitrary code. The availability of public proof-of-concept code lowers the skill barrier for attackers, and automated scanning tools can rapidly identify and exploit such flaws. In contrast, a local privilege escalation on an isolated lab workstation requires the attacker to first compromise the machine via another vector (e.g., phishing or physical access), which is far less likely given the network isolation.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security team runs a vulnerability scan on a web application and discovers an unpatched SQL injection flaw. The team prioritises remediation by CVSS score — critical flaws are patched within 24 hours, high within 7 days. Questions like this test whether you understand vulnerability management processes, scanning tools, and remediation prioritisation.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — This question tests Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The internet-facing VPN appliance because it has higher exposure and exploitability. — The internet-facing VPN appliance presents a higher risk because it is exposed to the public internet and has a known remote code execution vulnerability with public exploit code. This combination of high exposure (attack surface) and high exploitability (availability of proof-of-concept code) significantly increases the likelihood of a successful attack, making it the priority for remediation despite limited patch windows.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on SY0-701

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A vulnerability scan reports three findings: a critical remote code execution issue on an internet-facing VPN appliance with a public exploit, a high-severity local privilege escalation on an isolated lab PC, and a medium-severity outdated browser plug-in on a workstation used for training. Which finding should be remediated first?

medium
  • A.The isolated lab PC, because local privilege escalation is always the highest technical severity.
  • B.The internet-facing VPN appliance, because it combines critical severity, exposure, and public exploit availability.
  • C.The training workstation, because browser plug-ins are common entry points for attackers.
  • D.None of them, because all vulnerability findings should wait for the next planned maintenance cycle.

Why B: The internet-facing VPN appliance should be remediated first because it combines a critical severity rating, direct exposure to the internet, and a publicly available exploit. This creates an immediate and high-probability risk of remote code execution, which could lead to full compromise of the network perimeter. In contrast, the other findings are isolated or lower severity, making them less urgent.

Keep practising

More SY0-701 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.