- A
Open the link and compare it with the supplier's branding
Why wrong: Branding can be copied easily, so visual comparison is not a reliable verification method.
- B
Reply to the text and ask the sender to confirm the request
Why wrong: Replying keeps the conversation inside the attacker-controlled channel and does not provide trusted verification.
- C
Verify the request using a known supplier contact method before taking action
Out-of-band verification through a trusted phone number or established contact path is the safest way to confirm legitimacy.
- D
Forward the message to finance so they can decide whether it is legitimate
Why wrong: Escalation may be appropriate later, but it does not directly verify the request or prevent a possible compromise.
Quick Answer
The correct first step is to verify the request using a known supplier contact method before taking action. This is because social engineering attacks, such as phishing or business email compromise (BEC), rely on impersonating a trusted source to trick the victim into revealing sensitive data or redirecting payments. By using an out-of-band verification channel—like a phone number already on file rather than any contact info in the suspicious message—the clerk can confirm the request’s legitimacy without risking credential harvesting or malware from the link. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of verification steps as a core defense against social engineering, often appearing in questions about email or text-based impersonation. A common trap is the urgency in the message, which pressures you to act quickly without thinking; the exam expects you to recognize that independent verification is always the priority. Remember the mnemonic “Verify Before You Click” to reinforce that no link or callback number in an unsolicited message should ever be trusted.
SY0-701 Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations Practice Question
This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of threats, vulnerabilities, and mitigations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A procurement clerk receives a text message from someone claiming to be a supplier account manager. The message says a recent payment failed and asks the clerk to update bank details through a link to a secure portal. What should the clerk do first?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"first"Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Verify the request using a known supplier contact method before taking action
Option C is correct because the clerk should independently verify the request using a known supplier contact method (e.g., a phone number on file) before taking any action. This prevents falling victim to a social engineering attack, such as a phishing or business email compromise (BEC) attempt, where the attacker spoofs the sender's identity to redirect payments. Verifying through an out-of-band channel ensures the request is legitimate, as the link in the message could lead to a credential-harvesting site or malware download.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Open the link and compare it with the supplier's branding
Why it's wrong here
Branding can be copied easily, so visual comparison is not a reliable verification method.
- ✗
Reply to the text and ask the sender to confirm the request
Why it's wrong here
Replying keeps the conversation inside the attacker-controlled channel and does not provide trusted verification.
- ✓
Verify the request using a known supplier contact method before taking action
Why this is correct
Out-of-band verification through a trusted phone number or established contact path is the safest way to confirm legitimacy.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Forward the message to finance so they can decide whether it is legitimate
Why it's wrong here
Escalation may be appropriate later, but it does not directly verify the request or prevent a possible compromise.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates may choose Option D, thinking that forwarding to finance is a safe escalation, but the SY0-701 exam emphasizes that the first step is always independent verification using a trusted method, not delegating or relying on the suspicious communication channel.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This scenario is a classic example of a spear-phishing attack targeting payment fraud, often using SMS (smishing) or email. Attackers may use caller ID spoofing or domain spoofing to appear legitimate, and the link in the message could lead to a fake portal that captures credentials or initiates a man-in-the-middle attack. In a real-world case, the clerk should use a pre-established phone number or email address from a contract or internal directory, not the contact info in the suspicious message, to confirm the request.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
An employee at a financial services firm receives an email that appears to come from the IT helpdesk, asking them to reset their password via a link. The link leads to a convincing fake portal that harvests credentials. Security teams use phishing simulations and security-awareness training to reduce this attack vector. Questions like this test whether you can identify social engineering techniques and appropriate controls.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SY0-701 questions
1,152 questions across all exam domains
- →
Security+ SY0-701 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SY0-701 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
General Security Concepts practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to General Security Concepts.
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations.
Security Architecture practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Architecture.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Operations.
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Program Management and Oversight.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free SY0-701 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — This question tests Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Verify the request using a known supplier contact method before taking action — Option C is correct because the clerk should independently verify the request using a known supplier contact method (e.g., a phone number on file) before taking any action. This prevents falling victim to a social engineering attack, such as a phishing or business email compromise (BEC) attempt, where the attacker spoofs the sender's identity to redirect payments. Verifying through an out-of-band channel ensures the request is legitimate, as the link in the message could lead to a credential-harvesting site or malware download.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More SY0-701 practice questions
- An HR analyst must send a salary file to an external auditor. The auditor only needs names, departments, and salary tota…
- An investigator receives a suspect laptop drive that may be used in court. Which approach best supports a forensically s…
- An investigator must collect data from a suspected insider-threat laptop so the evidence could be used in an HR and lega…
- An NDR tool shows a production web server sending small, periodic DNS queries to random-looking subdomains under a domai…
- An investigator needs to make a forensic image of a suspect laptop without changing the original drive contents. Which t…
- An operations team manages Linux servers over SSH. The security team wants to stop direct management access from employe…
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.