mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A payroll SaaS provider has passed initial review, but before contract signing it announces that customer data will be processed by a new subcontractor in another country. The business wants to keep the onboarding timeline short, but security still needs assurance that the change does not increase exposure. What is the BEST next step?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A payroll SaaS provider has passed initial review, but before contract signing it announces that customer data will be processed by a new subcontractor in another country. The business wants to keep the onboarding timeline short, but security still needs assurance that the change does not increase exposure. What is the BEST next step?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Approve the vendor because the primary provider already passed the initial review.

The initial review is no longer sufficient because the service model has changed. New subcontractors can introduce new legal, privacy, and security risk.

B

Best answer

Update the third-party risk assessment and require evidence of the subcontractor's controls before approval.

This is the best next step because the change in subcontracting materially alters the risk profile. Security should reassess the provider, review the downstream party's controls, and confirm contractual obligations such as incident notification, data handling, and location requirements. This balances speed with due diligence and ensures the organization has current evidence before customer data is exposed to a new party.

C

Distractor review

Wait until the first quarterly audit to review the subcontractor change.

Delaying review increases exposure. A new subcontractor affecting payroll data should be assessed before go-live, not after the fact.

D

Distractor review

Accept the change if the vendor provides a marketing brochure describing its security program.

Marketing materials are not evidence of control effectiveness. Security needs verifiable documentation, not promotional statements.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Update the third-party risk assessment and require evidence of the subcontractor's controls before approval. — A subcontractor change can significantly affect privacy, availability, legal jurisdiction, and incident response obligations. The best response is to re-evaluate the third party and obtain evidence that the downstream provider meets the organization’s requirements before approval. This is especially important for payroll data because it includes sensitive personal and financial information. Proper due diligence includes updated risk review, contractual protections, and validation of the subcontractor’s security controls. Why others are wrong: Approving the change based only on the original assessment ignores the new risk introduced by the subcontractor. Waiting for a quarterly audit is too late because sensitive data may already be flowing to the new party. A brochure is not proof of control effectiveness and should never replace evidence such as assessments, attestations, or contractual security terms.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.