mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A payroll application allows the same user to create a vendor and approve a payment. The security team wants to reduce fraud without adding unnecessary complexity. Which principle should they apply?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A payroll application allows the same user to create a vendor and approve a payment. The security team wants to reduce fraud without adding unnecessary complexity. Which principle should they apply?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Separation of duties, so no single person can complete the entire high-risk workflow.

Separation of duties is the best control when one person should not be able to create and approve the same payment. By splitting responsibilities across different roles or approvals, the organization reduces the chance of fraud, abuse, or accidental misuse. This principle is common in finance and payroll workflows because it provides meaningful risk reduction without requiring a complicated technical redesign of the entire application.

B

Distractor review

Job rotation, so employees periodically switch responsibilities to learn each other’s tasks.

Job rotation can improve detection over time, but it does not directly prevent one person from controlling the whole workflow.

C

Distractor review

Defense in depth, so multiple technical tools inspect every payment form.

Defense in depth is broader and layered, but the key issue here is dividing authority within the process.

D

Distractor review

Least privilege, so the payroll user can create and approve only this one vendor payment.

Least privilege limits access, but it would still allow the same person to perform both risky actions in this scenario.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Authentication checks who the user is.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Separation of duties, so no single person can complete the entire high-risk workflow. — Separation of duties is the right principle because the risk is concentrated in one person being able to both create and approve a payment. By splitting those responsibilities, the organization creates an internal check that reduces fraud and mistakes. In finance and payroll processes, this is one of the most effective nontechnical safeguards because it forces collaboration or review before money moves. Why others are wrong: Job rotation may help employees learn different tasks, but it is not the primary control against fraud in a payment workflow. Defense in depth is a valid strategy, but it is too broad for this specific process-control problem. Least privilege limits access to only what is needed, but here the central issue is that one person should not hold both stages of the transaction. That is separation of duties.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.