Courseiva
General Security ConceptsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SY0-701 General Security Concepts Practice Question

A legal team must send a confidential contract to a partner so only the intended recipient can read it, and the partner also needs assurance the file really came from your company. Which approach best meets both needs?

⚠ Common exam trap

Many exam-takers confuse hashing with encryption or think that password-protecting a zip file provides strong security and sender authentication, when in fact only a proper public-key infrastructure (PKI) with encryption and digital signatures meets both confidentiality and non-repudiation requirements.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Encrypt the file with the recipient's public key and sign it with the sender's private key.

It uses asymmetric encryption to ensure confidentiality (encrypting with the recipient's public key ensures only the intended recipient can decrypt it with their private key) and digital signing (signing with the sender's private key provides non-repudiation and authenticity, proving the file came from the sender). This combination directly addresses both requirements: only the partner can read the contract, and the partner can verify the sender's identity.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Hash the contract and email the hash value separately.

    Why it's wrong here

    Hashing the contract and emailing the hash value separately only provides integrity, not confidentiality or authenticity. The original contract is still sent in plaintext, so anyone who intercepts the email can read it. Additionally, a hash alone does not prove the sender's identity, as any party with the file can compute the same hash, and an attacker who replaces both the contract and the hash would go undetected.

  • Encrypt the file with the recipient's public key and sign it with the sender's private key.

    Why this is correct

    Using the recipient's public key ensures only the intended recipient can decrypt the file, which provides confidentiality. Adding a digital signature with the sender's private key gives the partner a way to verify the file came from your company and has not been altered. Together, these controls address both privacy and authenticity, which is exactly what the scenario requires.

  • Use a shared symmetric key and send the key in the same email message.

    Why it's wrong here

    Using a shared symmetric key to encrypt the file is algorithmically sound, but sending the key in the same email message completely defeats the encryption. Any attacker who intercepts the email gains both the ciphertext and the key, allowing them to decrypt the file with no additional effort. This also provides no authentication, as the sender's identity is not verified through public-key cryptographic signatures.

  • Compress the file and password-protect the archive with a simple passphrase.

    Why it's wrong here

    Compressing the file and applying a simple passphrase with archive software relies on password-based encryption, which is typically weaker than public-key cryptography and is highly vulnerable to brute-force or dictionary attacks if the passphrase is simple. Furthermore, the passphrase would likely be transmitted via a separate email or message, creating a similar key-distribution vulnerability, and it offers no cryptographic proof of the sender's identity or the file's origin.

Quick reference

Symmetric Encryption Algorithm Comparison

AlgorithmKey SizeBlock SizeStatusNotes
AES-128128-bit128-bitCurrent standardNIST approved; WPA3, TLS
AES-256256-bit128-bitCurrent standardPreferred for sensitive / govt data
3DES112-bit effective64-bitDeprecated (2023)Replaced by AES
DES56-bit64-bitBrokenCracked in < 24 h; never deploy
ChaCha20256-bitStream cipherCurrentTLS 1.3, WireGuard

About these practice questions

This SY0-701 question is part of Courseiva's 1,013-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.