hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A finance laptop is opened to review an invoice attachment. EDR then shows winword.exe launching powershell.exe with hidden, no-profile, and base64-encoded arguments. No executable is written to disk, network beacons begin from memory, and after a reboot the activity disappears unless the document is opened again. What type of malware behavior is most likely?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

A finance laptop is opened to review an invoice attachment. EDR then shows winword.exe launching powershell.exe with hidden, no-profile, and base64-encoded arguments. No executable is written to disk, network beacons begin from memory, and after a reboot the activity disappears unless the document is opened again. What type of malware behavior is most likely?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Worm behavior, because the infection would self-replicate across systems through the network.

Worms focus on spreading to other systems. The key clues here are in-memory execution and document-triggered payloads, not autonomous network propagation.

B

Best answer

Fileless attack, because malicious code runs in memory and leaves little or no executable artifact on disk.

This is a classic fileless attack pattern. The process chain from a trusted Office app to hidden PowerShell, the encoded command line, the lack of a new binary on disk, and the disappearance after reboot all point to code executing primarily in memory. That makes detection harder and often means the initial document or script acts as the launcher rather than a traditional dropper.

C

Distractor review

Rootkit behavior, because the malware is hidden from normal user-mode tools.

Rootkits hide themselves, but the strongest clues here are memory-only execution and script-based launching from Office, not kernel-level hiding or tampering with system visibility.

D

Distractor review

Ransomware, because the user opened an invoice attachment before the suspicious activity started.

Ransomware would usually encrypt files, rename them, or display a ransom note. The described symptoms are process execution and beacons, not encryption or extortion.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Fileless attack, because malicious code runs in memory and leaves little or no executable artifact on disk. — A fileless attack is the best fit because the malicious code runs in memory, uses legitimate scripting tools, and leaves no obvious executable on disk. The encoded PowerShell launched from a document is a strong indicator that the attacker is leveraging trusted processes to avoid traditional file-based detection. The reboot clearing the behavior also supports an in-memory payload rather than persistent file-based malware. Why others are wrong: A worm would spread laterally and is not characterized by memory-only execution launched from a document. A rootkit focuses on concealment at a low level, often hiding files or processes from tools, but the core symptom here is script-based in-memory activity. Ransomware would visibly encrypt or rename data, which is not happening in the scenario.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.