A company wants employees to sign in once to several SaaS apps, while the security team also wants to require extra verification when users sign in from unmanaged devices or unusual locations. Which two architecture changes best satisfy both requirements? Select two.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.
Best answer
Federate authentication to a central identity provider.
Federation allows the organization to centralize authentication and give users a single identity across multiple SaaS applications. That is the architectural foundation for single sign-on because the SaaS apps trust the central identity provider instead of storing separate credentials. It also makes access governance easier because one identity system can enforce stronger controls and lifecycle management.
Best answer
Enable conditional access policies based on device posture and sign-in risk.
Conditional access is the right control for adapting access decisions based on context. If the device is unmanaged or the location is unusual, the policy can require additional verification, limit session duration, or block access entirely. This provides a dynamic security layer that supports the business goal without forcing the same treatment for every login.
Distractor review
Create separate passwords for each SaaS app so compromise is contained.
Separate passwords may reduce reuse, but they do not meet the single sign-on requirement and create more help desk burden. Users would still face password fatigue, and the organization would struggle to enforce consistent access policy across apps. The scenario calls for centralized identity, not more isolated password silos.
Distractor review
Turn off MFA because single sign-on already reduces logins.
Reducing the number of logins does not replace multifactor authentication. SSO improves usability, but it also means the central identity becomes even more important to protect. MFA should remain in place, especially when conditional access may identify higher-risk sign-in events that deserve stronger verification.
Distractor review
Use shared generic accounts for contractors to simplify onboarding.
Shared accounts destroy accountability and make investigations difficult because actions cannot be tied to a specific person. They also interfere with least privilege and offboarding. Even if onboarding seems simpler, generic accounts create unacceptable risk in a modern identity architecture.
Common exam trap
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Technical deep dive
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
- Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
- Underline the problem statement mentally.
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Security+ security operations questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ security operations questions.
Security+ zero trust questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ zero trust questions.
Security+ authentication factors questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ authentication factors questions.
More questions from this exam
Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.
Question 1
A laptop is suspected of being used in a malware incident. It is still powered on and connected to Wi-Fi. What should the responder do before shutting it down?
Question 2
An employee reports a ransomware note on a file server. The server is still powered on, shares are still being accessed, and management wants service restored as quickly as possible. What should the incident response team do first?
Question 3
An employee reports a ransomware note on a finance laptop. The laptop is still powered on, connected to Wi-Fi, and the user says they were just working in a spreadsheet. Management wants the fastest safe response that also preserves evidence. What should the responder do first?
Question 4
You are handed a company laptop suspected in an insider theft case. Legal says the evidence may be needed in court. Which action best preserves admissibility?
Question 5
A developer wants to reduce the risk of SQL injection in a new customer search form. Which two changes are the best mitigations? Select two.
Question 6
A branch office uses a flat LAN, and a compromise on one user workstation could spread quickly to finance systems. Management wants finance workstations isolated from general users, but finance staff still need access to a central finance application and network printer. What is the best design change?
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Federate authentication to a central identity provider. — The best answers are A and B. Federation gives the organization centralized authentication and single sign-on across SaaS applications, so users do not need separate credentials for each service. Conditional access then evaluates device trust and location before deciding whether to allow access or require more verification. Together, they meet both the usability and security goals in the scenario. Why others are wrong: C adds password complexity and does not provide SSO. D removes an important protection rather than improving the design. E makes identity tracking and access review much worse, which conflicts with secure enterprise access architecture.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.