mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A company can patch only one of two internet-facing systems this week. System 1 has a critical vulnerability but is reachable only through the corporate VPN during maintenance windows. System 2 has a medium vulnerability and supports the public payment site, which shows active attack traffic every day. Which system should be prioritized first?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A company can patch only one of two internet-facing systems this week. System 1 has a critical vulnerability but is reachable only through the corporate VPN during maintenance windows. System 2 has a medium vulnerability and supports the public payment site, which shows active attack traffic every day. Which system should be prioritized first?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

System 1, because the vulnerability is rated critical

Severity matters, but it is only one part of risk. A critical flaw with limited access may be less urgent than a lower-severity flaw on a heavily targeted public service.

B

Best answer

System 2, because it is exposed to the public and directly supports a business-critical service

System 2 should be patched first because risk depends on both exposure and business impact. A medium issue on a public payment site with active attacks presents a higher real-world risk than a critical issue on a system with narrower access. The payment service is also directly tied to revenue and customer trust, so delaying its remediation would create greater business exposure.

C

Distractor review

Neither system, because both are internet-facing and must wait for the next maintenance cycle

Waiting for convenience alone ignores the current risk picture. When a system is actively under attack, postponing remediation can leave the business exposed to avoidable harm.

D

Distractor review

System 1, because VPN access always makes a vulnerability more dangerous than a public application issue

VPN-restricted access can reduce exposure, but it does not automatically outweigh business impact and active attack conditions on another service. Risk must be assessed in context rather than by a single access condition.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: System 2, because it is exposed to the public and directly supports a business-critical service — System 2 is the better priority because risk management is based on context, not severity labels alone. A medium vulnerability on a public payment site is more likely to be attacked and could affect revenue, customer confidence, and transaction availability. The presence of active attack traffic increases the likelihood component, which makes the overall risk greater than the more isolated critical issue on System 1. Why others are wrong: Choosing System 1 relies too heavily on the severity label and ignores exposure. Choosing neither delays necessary action without a sound risk basis. Saying VPN access automatically makes a flaw more dangerous oversimplifies the situation; the real decision depends on accessibility, business impact, and current threat activity.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.