mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A caller claims to be from the company's SaaS provider and says a tenant migration will fail unless the help desk reads back a one-time verification code sent to an administrator's phone. The caller knows the admin's name and ticket number. What attack technique is being used?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A caller claims to be from the company's SaaS provider and says a tenant migration will fail unless the help desk reads back a one-time verification code sent to an administrator's phone. The caller knows the admin's name and ticket number. What attack technique is being used?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Pretexting, because the attacker is inventing a believable support story to gain trust.

The attacker is using a fabricated identity and a credible business scenario to manipulate the help desk into revealing a verification code. That is classic pretexting. The known name and ticket number are used to increase legitimacy, but the key behavior is the false story intended to bypass normal trust checks.

B

Distractor review

Watering hole, because the attacker is targeting a trusted web service used by employees.

A watering hole attack compromises a website to infect visitors. This scenario is a live phone-based deception attempt instead.

C

Distractor review

Tailgating, because the attacker is attempting to bypass a physical security barrier.

Tailgating involves physical entry behind an authorized person. There is no physical access attempt in this scenario.

D

Distractor review

Whaling, because the attacker is targeting a high-value executive account directly.

Whaling is a focused phishing attack against senior executives. Here the attacker is targeting the help desk through a support scam.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Pretexting, because the attacker is inventing a believable support story to gain trust. — This is pretexting because the attacker is constructing a believable support story to manipulate the help desk into disclosing an MFA code. The goal is to exploit trust and urgency rather than technical vulnerabilities. The ticket number and the admin's name are only used to make the story sound authentic. Security staff should verify requests through a separate trusted channel before taking action. Why others are wrong: Watering hole attacks rely on a compromised website or service, not a live support call. Tailgating is a physical social engineering tactic and does not fit a phone request. Whaling targets executives with phishing messages, usually by email or similar electronic communication, not a help desk phone conversation. The defining element here is the fabricated support narrative.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.